Re: Tokyo stabbibg


<ozarkheart@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:rpto54lhc49f6pejibmtlj96s5huhl18qd@xxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 07:44:39 GMT, "Blinky Bill" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:


<ozarkheart@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:us6m54hbuer2dpn1fm1cda0jg099ka75fp@xxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 02:08:06 GMT, "Blinky Bill" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:


<ozarkheart@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:e1gj54hcnlvdnt3j733sl1i0scq4k1i952@xxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 09:39:45 GMT, "Blinky Bill" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:






Your still outnumbered.

So they are all accurate with a range from 770,000 to 23 million? Or
you're
argument is that if enough inconsistent, unreliable and inaccurate
estimates
are made, then they become the truth. That's no more stupid than
anything
else you have written, odiousfart. I have come to expect such
nonsense
from
gun loons.

So let's see your estimate on the number of DGU's that occur each
year.

You want me to do your work for you? ROTFLMAO

No, stupid - I want you to do your own work.

Why is it my work to make an estimate of the number of dgus,
odiousfart -

You erroneously seem to think there are only 200.

You erroneously believe that.

Then set the record straight; how many do you think (whoops - wrong
word for you) "believe" occur?

I don't think there are only 200, which is what you claimed I think,
odiousfart. What I know is that estimates based on surveys are implausible,
and even some of the people who conducted those surveys admit that their
surveys are problematic.







As usual - you make claims but refuse to support them.

Why is it my work - I can't recall making any claims about the
individual
records. If you think I have then quote me.


That is what I require, dummy.

So you want me to produce documents that I haven't cited? Why would I
do
that?

Because that is the requirement.

Only for someone who doesn't know how to construct a rational argument.

I try to ignore your irrationality.

Why do you think it is irrational for me to refuse to produce documents I
haven't referenced?

You have referenced them, liar.

Then quote where I referenced them. I've asked for you to do that before,
but you haven't been able to. I guess shrieking 'liar' is your way of
running away from another spanking.







Requiring that I produce references for information I haven't cited is
irrational,

You have made reference to it.

When did I reference the original reports? I can recall referencing the
FBI
figures for annual justifiable homicides, but I can't recall making any
reference to individual police reports. Keep squirming odiousfart.

You did, liar

Then quote where I referenced them. I've asked for you to do that before,
but you haven't been able to. I guess shrieking 'liar' is your way of
running away from another spanking.


"very difficult to understand" - Gray Ghost assesses odiousfart's
scribblings

"Of course it is" - odiousfart admits that a claim of millions of DGUs is a
fantasy.

"You truly are a pathological lair..." - odiousfart over-extends his
ability by trying to use a word with more than 3 letters.

"Inability of Australians to buy a gun for the purpose of self defense."
- odiousfart's contribution to "positive effects of Australian gun laws"

"I am not dead" - odiousfart's self-centred and self obsessed gun loon
response to the fact that his family and community face 4 times the risk
of being killed via homicide than Australians.

"You made a statement and I pointed out, correctly, that to do so is
illegal." - netcop odiousfart shows his understanding of freedom of
speech

"Criminals don't obey the law" - deep thought from odiousfart.

Odiousfart writes "Murder rate has always been my interest"
but also says
"I have always addressed homicide rate" - does this make him a
pathological liar?

"I have always addressed homicide rate - not firearm homicide rate." -
says odiousfart and then cites a graph showing number of homicides, not
rates. Does this make him a pathological liar?

Data from 1947 is "very relevant" to a discussion over the period starting
1989-90



.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Tokyo stabbibg
    ... Why is it my work to make an estimate of the number of dgus, odiousfart - ... When did I reference the original reports? ... figures for annual justifiable homicides, but I can't recall making any ... "Inability of Australians to buy a gun for the purpose of self defense." ...
    (talk.politics.guns)
  • Re: Tokyo stabbibg
    ... Post the evidence, blinkydummy the proven liar. ... ROTFLMAO Where did I say every DGU ends in death? ... odiousfart - you don't understand English very well do you. ... comparing the only verified DGU statistic with the corresponding statistic ...
    (talk.politics.guns)
  • Re: Tokyo stabbibg
    ... UnI will gladly provide the information if you ask in a civil manner. ... Post the evidence, blinkydummy the proven liar. ... Still not civil, odiousfart. ... Why do you think that every DGU must ...
    (talk.politics.guns)
  • Re: Tokyo stabbibg
    ... The statistics in Australia show that a gun is much more likely to ... I should dance because you are a liar? ... More likely to bitten by a snake or struck by lightning. ... ROTFLMAO Poor odiousfart - standard response when spanked yet again. ...
    (talk.politics.guns)
  • Re: Tokyo stabbibg
    ... No odiousfart. ... infantile reponse of calling me a liar. ... I have cited the FBI URL which I used as a source. ... I don't recall saying I could provide the original police reports. ...
    (talk.politics.guns)