Re: Tokyo stabbibg
- From: ozarkheart@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 14:42:15 GMT
On Sat, 14 Jun 2008 01:49:06 GMT, "Blinky Bill" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
<ozarkheart@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:q2o454ds7ono5uvnn30sv1jpdpqh2cab7e@xxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 05:05:21 GMT, "Blinky Bill" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
snip
That's not borne out by what you have written before. "I am not dead"
was
your response when I pointed out that people where you live are
murdered
at
4 times the rate where I live. Your reply focussed totally on the
outcome
for you, not anyone else.
Unfortunately for you, you have simply exposed your lie again.
It was exactly what you wrote and the context in which you wrote it.
Once
again you make your usual childish tantrum response to any facts that
you
find disagreeable.
It is exactly what I wrote - and also pointed out that your satement
is wrong.
I pointed out that people where you live are murdered at 4 times the rate
where I live. You live in the US I live in Australia and the relative
murder
rate is correct. What is wrong with the statement?
Your statement was "I am not dead" - odiousfart's self-centred and
self obsessed gun loon response to the fact that his family and
community face 4 times the risk of being killed via homicide than
Australians."
It is incorrect. The people in my community are not murdered at 4
times the rate as Australians.
Your community can be your whole nation.
By your defintion, your statement is wrong.
My community does not share the same manners, tradition and law with
the whole nation.
Too bad youa re so stupid.......
community (plural communities)
1.. Group of people sharing a common understanding who reveal themselves
by using the same language, manners, tradition and law. (see civilization).
"You truly are a pathological lair..." - odiousfart over-extends his
ability by trying to use a word with more than 3 letters.
Spelling flame - how very blinkydummyish
"Inability of Australians to buy a gun for the purpose of self defense."
- odiousfart's contribution to "positive effects of Australian gun laws"
And blibkyboy refuses to post the statement I reponded to: Another
example of his dishonesty.
"I am not dead" - odiousfart's self-centred and self obsessed gun loon
response to the fact that his family and community face 4 times the risk
of being killed via homicide than Australians.
And another blatant lie by blinkboy
"You made a statement and I pointed out, correctly, that to do so is
illegal." - netcop odiousfart shows his understanding of freedom of
speech
And blinkyboy again displays his dishonesty
"Criminals don't obey the law" - deep thought from odiousfart.
Yet it keeps having to be explained to blinkydummy
Odiousfart writes "Murder rate has always been my interest"
but also says
"I have always addressed homicide rate" - does this make him a
pathological liar?
And another example of blinkydummy's dishonesty
"I have always addressed homicide rate - not firearm homicide rate." -
says odiousfart and then cites a graph showing number of homicides, not rates.
Does this make him a pathological liar?
And another example of blinkydummy's dishonesty
Data from 1947 is "very relevant" to a discussion over the period starting
1989. - odiousfart exhibits his knowledge of "facts and logic".
And blinkydummy again shows he just can't think....
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Tokyo stabbibg
- From: Blinky Bill
- Re: Tokyo stabbibg
- References:
- Re: Tokyo stabbibg
- From: Blinky Bill
- Re: Tokyo stabbibg
- From: ozarkheart
- Re: Tokyo stabbibg
- From: Blinky Bill
- Re: Tokyo stabbibg
- From: ozarkheart
- Re: Tokyo stabbibg
- From: Blinky Bill
- Re: Tokyo stabbibg
- From: ozarkheart
- Re: Tokyo stabbibg
- From: Blinky Bill
- Re: Tokyo stabbibg
- From: ozarkheart
- Re: Tokyo stabbibg
- From: Blinky Bill
- Re: Tokyo stabbibg
- Prev by Date: Re: Tokyo stabbibg
- Next by Date: Re: Tokyo stabbibg
- Previous by thread: Re: Tokyo stabbibg
- Next by thread: Re: Tokyo stabbibg
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|