Re: Consensus or senseless con?

"Trevor Wilson" <trevor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:69mul0F32fmvfU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:



"Gray Ghost" <grey_ghost471-newsgroups@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Xns9AA6D130BA584Wereofftoseethewizrd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Trevor Wilson" <trevor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:69m34vF33r5haU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:



"Scout" <me4guns@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:0HbZj.13896$IK5.7736@xxxxxxxxxxx

"Trevor Wilson" <trevor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:69ktdrF339879U1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


"Gray Ghost" <grey_ghost471-newsgroups@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Xns9AA699BF7A30Wereofftoseethewizrd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?pageId=64734

Thursday, May 22, 2008


**There are a total of 40 (yes, FORTY) climate scientists who signed
this petition. Their opinions are the only ones of interest.

IOW, those that say what Trevor wants to hear are all that he needs to
listen to, those that say something else......well Trevor just tells us
to ignore them.

**Nope. Here's how it works in the real world:

* IF I find a suspicious lump, or I have a chest pain, I go to a doctor.
I don't go to a geologist.
* If my dog is sick, I go to a vet. I don't consult a climatologist.
* If my car makes a strange noise, I take it to a mechanic. I don't
consult a mathematician.
* If I want to know about climatology, I speak to a climatologist. I
don't ask an economist.


Then why don't you listen to actual firearms experts regarding firearms?

**That would be a strawman. However, to answer your question, I am always
willing to listen to a firearms expert, when it comes to finding out about
firearms.

Like the shooter who can sto[ his heart?


Just to bring you back on-topic: If I want to know about climatology, I
speak to a climatologist. I don't ask an economist.


You mean like

Atmosphere, Earth, & Environment (3,697)

1. Atmosphere (578)

I) Atmospheric Science (114)
II) Climatology (40)
III) Meteorology (341 )

2. Earth (2,148)

I) Earth Science (107)
II) Geochemistry (62)
V) Geoscience (23)
VI) Hydrology (21)

3. Environment (971)

I) Environmental Engineering (473)
II) Environmental Science (256)
III) Forestry (156)
IV) Oceanography (86)


Who would have study data relecvant to "global warming" and would be able to
asses it's impact on thier areas of speciality?

or

Biochemistry, Biology, & Agriculture (2,924)

1. Biochemistry (768)

I) Biochemistry (703)
II) Biophysics (65)

2. Biology (1,365)

I) Biology (985)
II) Ecology (72)
III) Entomology (57)
IV) Zoology (145)
V) Animal Science (106)

3. Agriculture (791)

I) Agricultural Science (314)
II) Agricultural Engineering (111)
III) Plant Science (292)
IV) Food Science (74)


Who also would be in a position to assess the impact of global warming and
attempts to curtail it?

Sorry Trevor, selctive acceptance of experts and facts is only for the weak
minded and agenda driven.

Frank
.

Quantcast