Re: Consensus or senseless con?
- From: "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 06:24:56 +1000
"Scout" <me4guns@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:0HbZj.13896$IK5.7736@xxxxxxxxxxx
"Trevor Wilson" <trevor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:69ktdrF339879U1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Gray Ghost" <grey_ghost471-newsgroups@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Xns9AA699BF7A30Wereofftoseethewizrd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?pageId=64734
Thursday, May 22, 2008
**There are a total of 40 (yes, FORTY) climate scientists who signed this
petition. Their opinions are the only ones of interest.
IOW, those that say what Trevor wants to hear are all that he needs to
listen to, those that say something else......well Trevor just tells us to
ignore them.
**Nope. Here's how it works in the real world:
* IF I find a suspicious lump, or I have a chest pain, I go to a doctor. I
don't go to a geologist.
* If my dog is sick, I go to a vet. I don't consult a climatologist.
* If my car makes a strange noise, I take it to a mechanic. I don't consult
a mathematician.
* If I want to know about climatology, I speak to a climatologist. I don't
ask an economist.
--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Consensus or senseless con?
- From: Gray Ghost
- Re: Consensus or senseless con?
- From: Scout
- Re: Consensus or senseless con?
- From: Herb Martin
- Re: Consensus or senseless con?
- References:
- Consensus or senseless con?
- From: Gray Ghost
- Re: Consensus or senseless con?
- From: Trevor Wilson
- Re: Consensus or senseless con?
- From: Scout
- Consensus or senseless con?
- Prev by Date: Re: California Supreme Court Overturns Ban on Gay Marriage
- Next by Date: Re: Consensus or senseless con?
- Previous by thread: Re: Consensus or senseless con?
- Next by thread: Re: Consensus or senseless con?
- Index(es):