Re: Consensus or senseless con?

From: "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 19:41:09 +1000

"Gray Ghost" <grey_ghost471-newsgroups@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Xns9AA699BF7A30Wereofftoseethewizrd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?pageId=64734

Thursday, May 22, 2008

**There are a total of 40 (yes, FORTY) climate scientists who signed this
petition. Their opinions are the only ones of interest.

--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au

.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Consensus or senseless con?
  - From: Topp@Work
- Re: Consensus or senseless con?
  - From: ozarkheart
- Re: Consensus or senseless con?
  - From: Gray Ghost
- Re: Consensus or senseless con?
  - From: FerdinandAkin
- Re: Consensus or senseless con?
  - From: Scout

References:
- Consensus or senseless con?
  - From: Gray Ghost

Prev by Date: Re: Student Attacked at School With Stun Gun
Next by Date: Re: Consensus or senseless con?
Previous by thread: Consensus or senseless con?
Next by thread: Re: Consensus or senseless con?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread