Re: Kennedy has malignant brain tumor


"Kevin O'Connell" <KevinO'Connell@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:s4b734dphb2to3tiss97440n41upb1vsa2@xxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 20 May 2008 23:45:41 -0500, Mrs Wagonseller
<mrswagonseller@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Benj wrote:

On May 20, 3:29 pm, Peter Franks <n...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

betweentheeyes wrote:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080520/ap_on_re_us/kennedy_71

Could you folks in the Great state of Massachusetts do a better job
this
time at a Senate replacement?

That's too bad. Regardless of ideology or political persuasion, this
kind of stuff is never good to hear. I hope the best for him and his
family.


Family? Yes. Kennedy himself? Not on your life! I want that
sonofabitch to have lots of pain and suffering to just perhaps make
him think twice about all the evil and criminal thoughts he ran
through that brain of his! This is total poetic justice. REAL justice
would have been stretching his neck with a rope for treason (after a
fair trial, of course). The man worked overtime for years and years
trying to undermine the constitution of our republic to turn it into
some American version of the USSR. There are SO many of these guys
who swear an oath to support and defend the constitution with their
fingers crossed behind their backs. And I don't think it's by chance
that so many of them meet a bad end either in prison or like this.
These guys all think that Satan is a nifty quick shortcut to power and
pleasure, but they kind of forgot that eventually Satan's ultimate
goal is destroying EVERYONE! The fact that he gave you the power you
asked for along the way is irrelevant.

And that's besides murdering his girlfriend and unborn child.


he didn't murder anyone. She was as drunk as he was. She was far
from being a princess.

Far from being a princess is normally equally far from being a gutless murde
ring punk. He is, she wasn't. There is no equivalence here.

b.


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Kennedy has malignant brain tumor
    ... Regardless of ideology or political persuasion, ... trying to undermine the constitution of our republic to turn it into ... The fact that he gave you the power you ... And that's besides murdering his girlfriend and unborn child. ...
    (talk.politics.guns)
  • Re: DC v Heller: Amicus Brief of the Real Linguists, Part I
    ... If you'd ever seen a picture of the Second Amendment in action... ... Where does the Constitution say you can't commit human sacrifices? ... IX.The United States in Congress assembled, shall have the sole and exclusive RIGHT and power of determining on peace and war... ... As the new Constitution was being created and debated, what did the participants say about whether individual states, AND the NATION of states, AND the Federal Government itself had rights?: ...
    (talk.politics.guns)
  • Re: DC v Heller: Amicus Brief of the Real Linguists, Part I
    ... Please explain to me the 4th Amendment "people": ... source for what terms USED in the Constitution meant. ... States, in Congress assembled. ... and exclusive RIGHT and power of determining on peace and war... ...
    (talk.politics.guns)
  • Scholar: The claim "immigration is a federal matter" is DEAD WRONG as per the Constitution
    ... towards returning America to the Constitution, aka returning it to The Rule ... Federal government deal with matters which aren't in their purview as per ... The US Constitution Only Delegates the Power Over Immigration or Asylum to ...
    (soc.culture.jewish)
  • Re: U.S. justices could decide constitutionality of gun ownership
    ... Tell me why the States needed the so-called "Collective Right" Second Amendment? ... Opponents of the individual right to keep and bear arms claim the right enumerated in the Amendment is a "collective right" that pertains to the States' militias. ... If the States needed a so-called "collective right" amendment 3 years after the Constitution was adopted, then what fact or event necessitated the addition of such an Amendment? ... "THE STATES NEEDED A 'COLLECTIVE RIGHT' AMENDMENT BECAUSE THE CONSTITUTION GRANTED THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT THE POWER TO DISARM THE STATES' MILITIAS." ...
    (talk.politics.guns)
Loading