Re: Yet another reason why we need gun control...

On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 09:30:30 GMT, "Blinky Bill" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:


<ozarkheart@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:gunfr3pqdu036vj2h88p5206hqci6icrsq@xxxxxxxxxx
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 06:38:49 GMT, "Blinky Bill" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:


<ozarkheart@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:tmffr39g89ogviipvhhn3jpl738kfq0pdc@xxxxxxxxxx
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 02:52:59 GMT, "Blinky Bill" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:


<ozarkheart@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:lv6fr3hrvq9dsn6b1eh3birdb5gisg8clt@xxxxxxxxxx
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 02:24:19 GMT, "Blinky Bill" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:


"RSweeney" <dockscience@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:eaGdnS6FD_EKHyranZ2dnUVZ_hKdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"Blinky Bill" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:VhLtj.15778

You do not know precisely what's in them or how much of the active
drug.
THAT is why some users OD.

Decriminalising would not necessarily change that.

Do you believe that liquor stores sell antifreeze and methanol laced
booze?

Are you capable of making a post that addresses the subject under
discussion?

Are you able to think in the abstract?

Apparently my thoughts aren't as abstract as the previous poster.

Not only are they not as abstract - they seem to be missing.

It only seems that way to you because you have the attention span of a
gnat,
and the intelligence to go with it.

LOL You are the one who missed it - not me.

That's just how it seems to you <chuckle>





If you miss his point, perhaps
you will undertand when you finish high school.

And when you finish pre-school you might be able to explain the
ratiionale
behind using an analogy to explain another analogy which didn't explain
the
original subject of discussion.

LOL The rationale is very clear:

It only seems that way to you because you have the attention span of a
gnat,
and the intelligence to go with it.

And again.

Indeed <chuckle>

Glad you agree





So you are either dumb or dishonest.

Or rational.

Not quite

Very quite.



You pick.

Rational - one of the others fits you.

LOL Keep trying grassiopper

Um, whatever.





Shall I explain it for you?

Explain using an analogy to explain an analogy that failed to explain the
original argument being made? Don't hold back - go for it - I could do
with
a laugh.

LOL I wil use small words so you can understand (probably about a
50/50 proposition): Your comment "Decriminalising would not
necessarily change that." - referring to the quality of the product -
is wrong.

A statement of fact in a hypothetical situation - you are as mad as your
fellow gun-loons. No-one knows what other laws would change if drugs were
decriminalised, or how those laws would change.

No one knows exactly what will happen in any future circumstance,
dimbulb. However, even an fool such as yourself should be able to
predict there would be government controls.

But then again, I may be overanticipating your capabilities.



You quite obviously do not undestand how a product such as
drugs would be handled.

And neither do you, since it is a hypothetical situation. But you think the
world will conform to your fantasy.

LOL As opposed to your unrealistic fantasy? Mine is just about a
sure thing - whether you agree or not.



Now go back to school and stick to books with lots of pictures.

Don't get antsy - ask mummy to change your nappy.


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Yet another reason why we need gun control...
    ... Decriminalising would not necessarily change that. ... It only seems that way to you because you have the attention span of ... LOL You are the one who missed it - not me. ... behind using an analogy to explain another analogy which didn't ...
    (talk.politics.guns)
  • Re: Yet another reason why we need gun control...
    ... Decriminalising would not necessarily change that. ... It only seems that way to you because you have the attention span of ... LOL You are the one who missed it - not me. ... behind using an analogy to explain another analogy which didn't ...
    (talk.politics.guns)
  • Re: Yet another reason why we need gun control...
    ... Decriminalising would not necessarily change that. ... LOL You are the one who missed it - not me. ... behind using an analogy to explain another analogy which didn't explain ...
    (talk.politics.guns)
  • Re: Yet another reason why we need gun control...
    ... Decriminalising would not necessarily change that. ... LOL You are the one who missed it - not me. ... Sure - point out how there are no overdoses from prescription drugs subject ...
    (talk.politics.guns)
  • Re: Yet another reason why we need gun control...
    ... Decriminalising would not necessarily change that. ... LOL You are the one who missed it - not me. ... behind using an analogy to explain another analogy which didn't explain ... No-one knows what other laws would change if drugs were ...
    (talk.politics.guns)
Loading