Re: GUN NUT MASSACRES 5 WOMEN IN CHICAGO CLOTHING STORE
- From: "robw" <noddy093@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 18:58:12 -0500
One handgun a month and if you are a collector the law does NOT pertain to
you.
Your thoughts?
"Jim Bianchi" <jimbo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:slrnfqf84n.kf4.jimbo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 15:11:41 -0500, robw wrote:
My thinking is that if the guy didn't have access to the gun he probably
wouldn't have shot and killed people.
So. To prevent further incidents of criminals having access to a
gun, you want to stop me from buying any more? Of course, the murder of
those people is the overriding event, to the point that, if he is punished
for a crime, it will NOT be 'possessing a firearm in the commission of a
felony' but rather the crime of murder. Just as he would've been had he
used, say, a knife, or a bomb. What good would your proposed 'anti-straw
purchase' ordinance done then?
--
jimbo@xxxxxxxxx
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: GUN NUT MASSACRES 5 WOMEN IN CHICAGO CLOTHING STORE
- From: Bama Brian
- Re: GUN NUT MASSACRES 5 WOMEN IN CHICAGO CLOTHING STORE
- Prev by Date: Re: #West Virginia May Teach Schoolkids How To Use Firearms
- Next by Date: Re: ~~ 5 dead in strip mall shooting <= American Gun Madness ! ~~
- Previous by thread: Re: GUN NUT MASSACRES 5 WOMEN IN CHICAGO CLOTHING STORE
- Next by thread: Re: GUN NUT MASSACRES 5 WOMEN IN CHICAGO CLOTHING STORE
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
