Re: CA Appeals Court Overturns Ban-- Roger Denny Left Sucking Wind




"Gray Ghost" <grey_ghost471-newsgroups@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Xns9A2B17815A3B4Wereofftoseethewizrd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Roger Denney <rgdenney@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:5a43p3prtgbanc2uc9ul3fejsknqjhco33@xxxxxxx:

On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 20:42:21 GMT, "Wayne" <mygarbagecan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:


<aklon3@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:a9ab0353-3797-4ed4-9e19-a9ceb2fce5e8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Jan 17, 10:31 pm, Roger Denney <rgden...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

You may be able to own a handgun in San Francisco in your homes, but
bring it with you on your person or in your car and see how fast you
are in cuffs down at the SFPD station.

<snip>

ROTFLMAO!!! Don't know much about gun laws do you?

Yes, I do, in fact.

I have spent many hours helping to craft violence control legislation
in regards to gun-control laws so, as usual, you are incorrect.

You may come up with specific instances where one could get in trouble
carrying a firearm in any town. However, your statement was rather all
encompassing.
"bring it with you on your person or in your car and see how fast you are in
cuffs down at the SFPD station." So you think SF law invalides all the
state laws that permit carrying a gun on your person and in your car?

You might wish it were that way, but sorry to tell you......you are wrong.
SF can write all the anti gun laws they want, but isn't that the way you
just got your fingers slapped by the state?




.