Re: Late Betrayal on Gun Rights


"Spaz" <yeah@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:RpWdnTJtHpMLEwzanZ2dnUVZ_sKqnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Cole Firearms Inc." <colefirearms11@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:QGfkj.765$so6.494@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

The brief is a disappointing about face for a Justice Department once
lauded for its ardent defense of Second Amendment rights.

aaawwww, boooo hoooo hooooo

Attorney General Michael Mukasey owes gun owners an explanation for this
late betrayal.

nobody owes you anything

In a recent Townhall.com column, former National Rifle Association
president Sandy Froman protested the Justice Department?s misguided
action. She correctly explains the government?s position includes only
halfhearted support for the Second Amendment. If the Supreme Court were
to adopt the Department?s position, it would imperil our civil right to
keep and bear arms.

Since your "civil right to keep and bear arms" is based on a lying
interpretation of the 2nd amendment, you will lose NOTHING when the
Supreme Court corrects that interpretation in the upcoming months.

Are you, personally, going to come around to take our guns? No? Then we're
going to lose NOTHING no matter which way the buttinskis in black might
rule.


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Late Betrayal on Gun Rights
    ... The brief is a disappointing about face for a Justice Department once ... lauded for its ardent defense of Second Amendment rights. ... Since your "civil right to keep and bear arms" is based on a lying ... a right but letting government do almost whatever it wants to that right. ...
    (talk.politics.guns)
  • Re: Joint relinquishing of rights
    ... >>The US Second Amendment actually says: ... This appears to make the right to keep and bear arms ... > contingent on a militia, or being in a militia, but we still modify ... I'd substitute a word and make it the interpretation of the use ...
    (alt.usage.english)
  • Bush Justice Department files legal brief on DC gun ban case
    ... lawyer for the Justice Department. ... the brief argues that the Second Amendment protects ... that any and all guns can be controlled or banned if a federal court ...
    (misc.survivalism)
  • Rick Stanley STANFORD LAW REVIEW ON 2AM BY NRA ATTORNEY!
    ... SYMPOSIUM: The Right to Keep and Bear Arms: A Right to Self-Defense Against Criminals and Despots ... By guaranteeing that "a well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed," the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution provides the citizens a means of protection against the unjust excesses of government. ... Legislative history demonstrates that the Framers certainly recognized the importance of a militia to the security of a free state, but that they also intended to guarantee the individual right to keep and to bear arms, refusing to adopt proposals that omitted or limited an individual guarantee. ... A written constitution is a reminder that governments can be unreasonable and unjust. ...
    (talk.politics.guns)
  • Re: The security of a free state?
    ... expert on English usage in the Los Angeles school system. ... He's on the usage panel of the American Heritage Dictionary, ... The right to keep and bear arms is not said by the amendment to depend on ... Second Amendment to the United States Constitution? ...
    (talk.politics.guns)