Re: FIGHT OR FLIGHT
- From: "Spaz" <yeah@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2007 13:20:58 -0800
"redpoet" <redpoet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:87038266-09f8-46ba-baa3-662343af9377@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In Ohio they're trying to reverse that and force the intruder to prove
he wasn't a danger to you.
That won't fly. It goes COMPLETELY against the "innocent until proven guilty" principle.
I don't know, call me crazy, but that sounds damn reasonable to
me...well, depending on how the law reads anyway.
You're crazy.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: FIGHT OR FLIGHT
- From: Buck Mulligan
- Re: FIGHT OR FLIGHT
- From: Felix D.
- Re: FIGHT OR FLIGHT
- From: Scout
- Re: FIGHT OR FLIGHT
- From: Robert Mercurio
- Re: FIGHT OR FLIGHT
- References:
- FIGHT OR FLIGHT
- From: redpoet
- FIGHT OR FLIGHT
- Prev by Date: Re: Court could void D.C. law based on Ninth Amendment
- Next by Date: Re: Oh No a DEADLY AK-47 was used on Omaha
- Previous by thread: Re: FIGHT OR FLIGHT
- Next by thread: Re: FIGHT OR FLIGHT
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|