Re: FIGHT OR FLIGHT
- From: "Felix D." <#1Chekist@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 19:13:55 -0800
"Buck Mulligan" <bkmulligan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:k16hl35upgjhhb0akhmf04uoknc5r3116e@xxxxxxxxxx
In talk.politics.guns redpoet <redpoet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
FIGHT OR FLIGHT
Oread Daily http://oreaddaily.blogspot.com/
What would you do if you were confronted by an intruder in your home
late one night? Would you run for the hills? Would you ask the
intruder what they were up to? Would you defend the place, yourself,
your loved ones.? Well, in lots of states if you choose self defense
and shoot the intruder you'd better be able to prove you were in
immediate danger of great bodily harm...or you might get sued.
Any state with a Duty-to-retreat law should be forced from the Union
That would start with California, if I'm not mistaken. I can't see how
losing California would operate to the detriment of the nation. The lefties
are going to destroy the place soon enough anyway, so maybe it's better to
cut this cancer out of the body politic now rather than later.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: FIGHT OR FLIGHT
- From: Buck Mulligan
- Re: FIGHT OR FLIGHT
- References:
- FIGHT OR FLIGHT
- From: redpoet
- Re: FIGHT OR FLIGHT
- From: Buck Mulligan
- FIGHT OR FLIGHT
- Prev by Date: Re: Court could void D.C. law based on Ninth Amendment
- Next by Date: Re: Court could void D.C. law based on Ninth Amendment
- Previous by thread: Re: FIGHT OR FLIGHT
- Next by thread: Re: FIGHT OR FLIGHT
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|