Re: which WWII USA weapon would you choose ?
- From: "SaPeIsMa" <SaPeIsMa@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 22:40:11 -0500
"trippin-2-8-trak" <bb69@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:fdk25d$hp7$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
# # Now, ask yourself which one is more likely to cause the user of the
# # other to drop his rifle in the sand. If you're alive and uninjured why
# # would you be dropping your rifle in sand?
#
# Hit the ground when Ambused and under fire.
#
# Seems these days the M16 is doing that a lot more.
yes, sure....the M16 is so bad, the USA is the only superpower left in the
world cuz of it...and the gun wins the military 1000 yd. matches
methinks it's time someone got a reality check
Indeed
When are you getting one ?
The US did NOT become a superpower on the M16
In actual fact, it became so on the M1 Garand, if you're going to make that kind of nonsense claim
As to winning 1000 yard matches
The Garand, the M14 and even the Springfield were doing so LONG BEFORE the M16 came along
So what was the point you were trying to make ?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: which WWII USA weapon would you choose ?
- From: The Lone Weasel
- Re: which WWII USA weapon would you choose ?
- Prev by Date: Re: which WWII USA weapon would you choose ?
- Next by Date: Re: which WWII USA weapon would you choose ?
- Previous by thread: Re: which WWII USA weapon would you choose ?
- Next by thread: Re: which WWII USA weapon would you choose ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|