Re: Increased gun crime in Britain

On Aug 29, 11:11 pm, "RD (The Sandman)"
<rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote:
Phil Smythe <smy...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in news:1188301203.707111.308940
@x35g2000prf.googlegroups.com:







RD (The Sandman) spamlock wrote:
Phil Smythe <smy...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:1188214722.866361.135300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

On Aug 27, 1:04 am, "RD (The Sandman)"
<rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote:
John-Melb <mcnamara_j...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
innews:1188141058.843490.279950@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

On Aug 26, 11:21 pm, Phil Smythe <smy...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Therefore would you explain what was your basis for claiming
"Gun
crime in Britan has doubled" given that the article you posted
does not support this claim.

Wasn't my claim, whole text copied and pasted from another
source.

Sorry I didn't check the every aspect of the technical
correctness
of something I posted, would you demand the same level of
technical
correctness from an anti-gun poster?

He doesn't even demand that same level of technical correctness
from
himself.

--
RD (The Sandman)

Care to back that one up RD, or are simply engaging in the easiest
form of defence, the unsubstantiated accusation?

I really don't waste my time with you anymore, Phil. It becomes a
case
of mental masturbation.

--
RD (The Sandman)

Well, if anyone would know about masturbation, it's you RD. And that
you wouldn't or more likely couldn't back up your claim is no real
surprise either.

Sorry, Phil, but if you ever wish to change my opinion of you, you will
have to change. Most of the time you do all right and present excellent
arguments, but often enough, you shuck and jive rather than simply admit
you were wrong or misspoke.

--
RD (The Sandman)

So I "often enough, shuck and jive rather than simply admit I was
wrong or misspoke". Do you recall how in my previous post to you I
stated "And that you wouldn't or more likely couldn't back up your
claim is no real surprise either"? Well, you just done it, AGAIN. All
you and your fellow travellers seem capable of is accusations, when it
comes to evidence you are woefully short.

Here's you big chance. PRODUCE evidence that I have been "wrong or
misspoke"? In this thread I was 100% correct which even the
originator, John-Melb conceded. Of course it was my querying of what
John-Melb posted that seems to have been my big crime. So RD, let's
see your evidence of my so called errors.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Increased gun crime in Britain
    ... He doesn't even demand that same level of technical correctness ... RD (The Sandman) ... Sorry, Phil, but if you ever wish to change my opinion of you, you will have to change. ... Most of the time you do all right and present excellent arguments, but often enough, you shuck and jive rather than simply admit you were wrong or misspoke. ...
    (talk.politics.guns)
  • Re: Just because he can
    ... You used a quote of mine to try to defend your dishonest snipping, ... Unsubstantiated accusation. ... Come on, Sandman, stop lying. ... The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits. ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: Jims unanswered question...
    ... Put your cards on the table. ... I would love to show my evidence that your CSS did not validate. ... If nobody is willing to step up we can still post our support into CSMA... ... You see, Sandman, even you know you are lying. ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: Sandman digest, volume 2453299
    ... > Today's Sandman digest: ... > I'm well aware that you snipped the evidence for your trolling, ... > You're erroneously presupposing that I'm harassing you, ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Re: Sandman digest, volume 2453299
    ... > Today's Sandman digest: ... > I'm well aware that you snipped the evidence for your trolling, ... > You're erroneously presupposing that I'm harassing you, ...
    (sci.astro)