Re: Anti-Gun Hysteria!
- From: Chris Morton <cmorton@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 13 Aug 2007 11:37:47 -0700
In article <kiuvb3dtf6p8lm5hb1lerv7pjnpihlv746@xxxxxxx>, swamp says...
I guess it comes down to this: Does the superior defensive
effectiveness of handguns in close-quarter situations outweigh their
increasing usage as offensive, close-quarter weapons.
That would require that there actually BE an "increasing usage as offensive,
close-quarter weapons".
But you don't really care. You'd rather that a woman be beaten, raped and
murdered than for her to defend herself with a handgun.
--
Gun control, the theory that 110lb. women have the "right" to fistfight with
210lb. rapists.
.
- References:
- Re: Anti-Gun Hysteria!
- From: swamp
- Re: Anti-Gun Hysteria!
- From: RD (The Sandman)
- Re: Anti-Gun Hysteria!
- From: swamp
- Re: Anti-Gun Hysteria!
- From: RD (The Sandman)
- Re: Anti-Gun Hysteria!
- From: swamp
- Re: Anti-Gun Hysteria!
- From: RD (The Sandman)
- Re: Anti-Gun Hysteria!
- From: swamp
- Re: Anti-Gun Hysteria!
- From: Chris Morton
- Re: Anti-Gun Hysteria!
- From: swamp
- Re: Anti-Gun Hysteria!
- Prev by Date: Re: Anti-Gun Hysteria!
- Next by Date: Re: Attack on California gun show, help !!
- Previous by thread: Re: Anti-Gun Hysteria!
- Next by thread: Re: Anti-Gun Hysteria!
- Index(es):