Re: Dave Kopel's Second Amendment Newsletter

Magus <Nope@xxxxxxxxx> said:
The Lone Weasel wrote:
Magus <Nope@xxxxxxxxx> said:
The Lone Weasel wrote:
Magus <Nope@xxxxxxxxx> said:
The Lone Weasel wrote:
Magus <Nope@xxxxxxxxx> said:
Morton Davis wrote:
"Magus" <Nope@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:wiAri.17037$MW6.15793@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


Why? I never said rights were or were not granted
by the Constitution--all I addressed was the
RKBA--you're the creating strawmen and then trying
to support them.

Rights are not granted by the Constitution. The
Constitution protects rights which pre-existed it.
Attempting to coinverse with the weasel is like
trying to pick up runny shit. Best to just killfile
him and forget him.

Whether rights are or are not granted by the
Constitution was not the point being addressed--the
statement made was that the RKBA was not granted by
the Constitution.

So you believe in an hierarchy of rights in the
Constitution, eh Magoo?

And again, you're creating another strawman and
goalpost shift.

Okay, why don't you appraise the lobbyist's exploitation
of your time, money and feelings of self-worth in terms
of value investing? Where's your safety net with the
gunlobby's lawyers? You can't use standard legal
references to justify their claims so you remain a kook
until kooks rule America.

If you are implying the "collective right" proponents
[like yourself] use "standard legal references" [like you
claim to], does that mean that they're just making shit
up to [just like you did re Cruikshank]?

http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/casesearch.pl?
court=us&CiRestriction=92+u.s.+542&

http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/casesearch.pl?
court=circs&CiRestriction=%2292+U.S.+542%22&

Happy learning, Magoo.

Ah, you're saying it's just you that makes shit up.

US Supreme & federal cases respectively, that cite US v
Cruikshank.

Pleasant perusals, Maglue.


--

Yours truly,

The Lone Weasel


.