Re: Why are Gun Nutters so Ignorant of the rest of the Constitution ? --- D.C. Court Case Puts All American Gun Laws in Danger<<-->>?

Kent Finnell wrote:

"Fran Sheehan" <Boston@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:sfsqi.22$ZO3.21@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

_ Prof. Jonez _ wrote:


jfma@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:


On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 11:21:20 -0400, Fran Sheehan <Boston@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:


¥ UltraMan ¥ wrote:


Reid Anderson wrote:


_ Prof. Jonez _ wrote:


Bama Brian wrote:


_ Prof. Jonez _ wrote:


Jim Bianchi wrote:




Mr Jonez: You seem to be saying that what's become known as the
'militia clause' of the 2nd is the only thing the 2nd is about,
that for this reason, it must somehow override the 'rights
clause' as concerns the people as a whole.

No override, the entire 2nd Amendment speaks about "A well
regulated Militia" and the right of The People <of that well
regulated Militia> to keep and bear arms.

So it is only those people in the militia who have the rights
enumerated in the other nine amendments of the BoR?


Do the other 9 amendments begin with, or even use the phrase
"a well regulated Militia", eh numbnuts?


"The People" _are_ the militia, you jackass.


Not ALL "the people" you ignorant imbecile.

Of course not. People in jail, and retards like you, are not allowed.


Yes, all the people except the ones that have their rights
restricted by due process


Where was the "due process" that denied Negroes, Indians and Women
the rights under the original Constitution?

Show WHERE in the US Constitution, where it mentions what you claim, you jackass.


And those problems have been fixed with proper amendments,


It wasn't "fixed", as it was never there to begin with, as HE claimed/ insinuated! :)



so to use the fools' argument that the conditions that existed at the founding that prompted the 2nd Amendment don't exist today, neither do the exclusions of Negroes, Indians, and women.

I know that!

Professor Poofter is a liar, fool, and a jackass.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: DC v Heller: Amicus Brief of the Real Linguists, Part I
    ... many "classes" of people who have forfeited their rights. ... a well-regulated militia, when such a person would be FOUR WAYS ... GUARANTEED by the Constitution! ... share in the power and rights of the whole, ...
    (talk.politics.guns)
  • Re: Its all about hunting for the Dems?
    ... Amendment has to do with a militia, ... So do you believe that gun ownership ... The Bill of Rights involves personal rights, ... and those responsible for using the War ...
    (alt.politics.bush)
  • Re: If Obama Supports The Second Amendment....
    ... politicized standing army or a select militia to rule. ... the principle of our state bill of rights, ... Were talking about the Federal Constitution, ... Too bad the Second Amendment isn't limited to the militia. ...
    (talk.politics.guns)
  • Re: If Obama Supports The Second Amendment....
    ... politicized standing army or a select militia to rule. ... "But we need not give them power to abolish our militia. ... A further amendment proposed, was, "that the militia should not ... The unamended Constitution and the Bill of Rights ...
    (talk.politics.guns)
  • Re: Does the Militia Preface Qualify the Right to Keep and Bear Arms?
    ... In light of the question presented in The District of Columbia v. Heller now pending in the Supreme Court, I have updated the SSSN version of my article, Was the Right to Keep and Bear Arms Conditioned on Service in an Organized Militia?, so you can now download the final version as it appeared in the Texas Law Review. ... Those who deny that the original meaning of the Second Amendment protected an individual right to keep and bear arms on a par with the rights of freedom of speech, press and assembly no longer claim that the amendment refers only to a collective right of states to maintain their militias. ... It is a right that is owned due to membership in the society. ...
    (talk.politics.guns)