Re: Armed & Dangerous - Arming Person Found To Be A Danger To Themselves - 60 Minutes


The Lone Weasel wrote:

Larry Pratt says that mentally ill persons who have been
adjudicated a danger to themselves should have guns.

Actually Larry Pratt hasn't been saying that, though the hatchet edit
job they did on him was positively astounding! They made him look like
a loon and put words in his mouth that would have Michael Moore
handing over the oscar he got for his so-called "documentary".

What Larry has been saying is that a person who has been adjudicated a
danger, should not be considered such for THE REST OF THEIR LIFE! And
Larry has been quite vocal about just WHAT constitutes an
adjudication! Some government bureaucrat filling out a form should
not do it. I don't care if that bureaucrat happens to be a judge.
It's only valid if there is DUE PROCESS! That means the accused gets
to bring their own doctors and witnesses and rules for a fair
proceeding are maintained.

Wayne LaPierre says that mentally ill persons who have been
adjudicated a danger to themselves should not have guns.

But did not endorse the current Dem bill to close another so-called
"loophole". He notes that the devil is in the details and he wants to
SEE the exact LANGUAGE in any bill before the NRA endorses it. A wise
choice in Washington to be SURE!

A gunlobby divided against itself cannot stand it anymore.

Oh my! A graveyard! Whistle, Whistle, Whistle!
Laugh, laugh, laugh.

But lets do some straight talk here. Should a person who is a danger
to themselves and other be allowed to run free without supervision,
let alone have a gun? Obviously the answer is "Hell no!"

But now comes the other question. If a person becomes sick and has a
disease, can they ever be considered cured? Should sex offenders be
hounded mercilessly for the rest of their lives long after their jail
time has been served? Should the mentally ill (as opposed to mentally
defective which implies that the disease is incurable) ALL be
considered incurable?

Note that if fascists like Weasel were as "caring" as they pretend,
they'd write laws that allowed the mentally ill to go to court if they
were considered cured and have the gun prohibition reversed. But that
would put guns BACK into the hands of citizens, wouldn't it? You KNOW
grabbers will never stand for anything that does that no matter how
fair and "sensible".

But the law as it stands says, that once you are a loon, you are
ALWAYS a loon for the rest of your life! And to gun-grabbers who
could give a *** about mental health issues, as Larry Pratt was
briefly allowed to say, it's just one more scam to use the blood of
innocent victims to try to gather up more guns. Each gun your take and
refuse to give back is one more gun that will never be used to resist
a fascist take-over! AND THAT is the bottom line here. Every gun you
grab is like one more vote for the NewStates of America. And any
emotional issue you can use to grab a gun is fair game! SiegHeil!

.

Quantcast