Re: The Need Of Guns

"Joe Steel" <NoSpam@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Xns99106C988AC1Eaa10021highstreamnet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"ubermutant" <webmasta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:k5qdnQmRNd66qoPbnZ2dnUVZ_vShnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx:


"Joe Steel" <NoSpam@xxxxxxx> wrote in message


You're just sputtering and spewing nonsense.
Do you have anything else?

Earlier, you barfed up this jewel ...

Life was among the interests of the dead Russians. They had no
right to life, though, because their political system condemned
them to death. Conceptually, this is not much different from the
predicament

So, a murder victim has no right to live, by definition. That truly
breathtaking. I'm not going to add a single freaking thing to that,
it speaks for itself.


They're not "murder victims." Murder is unlawful killing. While we may
find the circumstances of their deaths abhorrent, they were killed
according to the laws of their country.

In fact, they were not. It was unlawful, no laws were passed that allowed
it, the party apparatus simply killed 'em.

I would welcome better-informed comments from you. Perhaps you could do
bit of research.

You need to do the research. And also a bit of thinking.

B.


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: The Need Of Guns
    ... They're not "murder victims." ... Murder is unlawful killing. ... may find the circumstances of their deaths abhorrent, ... killed according to the laws of their country. ...
    (talk.politics.guns)
  • Re: The Need Of Guns
    ... you barfed up this jewel ... ... right to life, though, because their political system condemned ... So, a murder victim has no right to live, by definition. ... find the circumstances of their deaths abhorrent, ...
    (talk.politics.guns)