Re: The Need Of Guns

"ubermutant" <webmasta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:XIGdnZRpFaswwIDbnZ2dnUVZ_r6vnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx:

"Joe Steel" <NoSpam@xxxxxxx> wrote in message

You're confusing interests and rights.

As I said. A true believer.

Indeed, everyone has inherent interests. Some are universal and
fundamental and we think of these as natural "rights" but they're
not. No right exists unless it is codified.

Bull***. Rights exists whether they are recognized or not, just as
reality exists whether Liberals recognize it or not.

Life was among the interests of the dead Russians. They had no right
to life, though, because their political system condemned them to
death. Conceptually, this is not much different from the predicament
of a condemned criminal. He would like to live but his political
system will not protect his life so the State may kill him.

I said that to be absurd. Apparently you really believe it. It's
worse than I thought.

Like anyone who appreciates material possessions, the thief has an
interest in the auto. The community, however, does not protect the
acqusition by theft of autos as they do by purchase. Law-abiding
citizens who purchase autos such as the one the thief covets are
protected by a property right. The may acquire and enjoy the
property to the exclusion of all other persons without fear of being
lawfully deprived of it. The thief, however, has no such
expectation. His attempts to acquire and enjoy the vehicle will be
opposed by the community.

Indeed. It IS worse than I thought. You actually buy into this
malarky. Did you get into some bad drugs, or are you just a current
by-product of the public education industry?


You're just sputtering and spewing nonsense.

Do you have anything else?
.

Quantcast