Re: Anti everything people and useless laws


"Trevor Wilson" <trevor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:45e4df47$0$16274$88260bb3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<ozarkheart@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:tio9u2p6g1v87ktdhbloh0hlf1veomhcdp@xxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 16:32:22 +1100, "Trevor Wilson"
<trevor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


<ozarkheart@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:pl57u2lq203n690kg3nli23d1mnuirohum@xxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 14:02:04 +1100, "Trevor Wilson"
<trevor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


<ozarkheart@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:r1j4u25ivklse25mv40vm6q6q5lsji9jln@xxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 12:59:39 +1100, "Trevor Wilson"
<trevor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
snip


**Good. Keep reading. There's (much) more to come. I freely admit
that I
cannot show cause and effect.

Then you are just blowing smoke.

Thanks for admitting it.

**I've never denied it.


The evidence, howeer, is compelling.

No it isn't

**Yeah, it is.



Moreover,
evidence from within the US, itself, demonstrates that allowing
people
to
carry guns around the streets, does not keep crime (notably:
Homicide)
lower
than in areas where concealed carry is disallowed.

No there isn't

**Yeah, there is. Consider the homicide rates of two US cities:

NYC - Where concealed carry is not allowed (for all intents)
Miami - Where concealed carry is allowed.

Miami has a much higher homicide rate than NYC. Therefore, allowing
people
to carry guns does not enhance public safety.

Really? Check out Vermont.

**Why? How long has Vermont been a major US city?


Hmmm. So you are saying that it is "major cities" that have a
problem?

**It seems you don't understand my question. I'll re-state it:

Why? How long has Vermont been a major US city?



Why wouldn't a "minor city" have a problem?

**Why? How long has Vermont been a major US city?

So your "theory" applies only to major US cities?


.