Re: "Gun buyback scheme halves firearm deaths"

In talk.politics.guns "Phil Smythe" <smytph@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


¿mÿ§t뮦@n? wrote:
In talk.politics.guns "Phil Smythe" <smytph@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


¿mÿ§t뮦@n? wrote:
In talk.politics.guns "Phil Smythe" <smytph@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


¿mÿ§t뮦@n? wrote:
In talk.politics.guns "Phil Smythe" <smytph@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


Total nonsense. For starters NOBODY expected or claimed that the laws
would have an instantaneous, day one, effect.

Yet you are totally unable to show ANY effect whatsoever.

WRONG. The stated aim was to limit the possibility of firearm mass
murders and since that time there have been NONE.

ROFLMAO

I KNEW you'd fall back on this shit. But of course, we're talking
about

:Re: "Gun buyback scheme halves firearm deaths"

Once more- let's talk about DEATHS, not FIREARMS DEATHS. Death is what
we're trying to curtail. The graphs show your homicides to be about
the same, before, during, and after the confiscation.

You lose, sucker.


Good of you to proclaim yourself a winner, nobody else would.

You're obviously too stupid to see it.

The graph YOU quoted shows a flat number of homicides over a 17 year
period which,

Thanks for pointing that out. Now, show us where the gun confiscation
made any difference.

That's the point you keep dancing around. Wonder why? LOL

What a predictable response!

Yes, your "it'[s to prevent mass murder!" is the response you've been
using for- what, years now?

Now, show us where the gun confiscation reduced murders. You can't.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

.