Re: The Second Amendment in court
- From: The Lone Weasel <loneweasel@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 21 Dec 2006 00:56:12 GMT
James Beck <jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said in
<news:MPG.1ff37a78302f8db1989dc8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on Wed 20 Dec
2006 04:33:30p:
In article <1166650947.782172.145220@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
leifrakur2@xxxxxxxxxxx says...
That is just plain 'ol stupid.
The Lone Weasel wrote:
James Beck <jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said in
<news:MPG.1ff367e261e11120989dc6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on Wed 20
Dec 2006 02:32:20p:
In article <1166645455.601019.55110@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
leifrakur2@xxxxxxxxxxx says...
That's because my natural rights cease where yours begins.
James Beck wrote:
In article <Xns989F73E3C81C2loneweaselyhdc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
loneweasel@xxxxxxxxx says...
James Beck <jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said inWhat fate would that be?
<news:MPG.1ff32c363a80d2ee989dc2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
Wed 20 Dec 2006 10:17:49a:
In article <Xns989F5BAD6F2EEloneweaselyhdc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
loneweasel@xxxxxxxxx says...
Peter Franks <none@xxxxxxxx> said in
<news:l35ih.23481$Zb5.16091 @newsfe13.phx> on Wed 20 Dec
2006 12:50:58a:
The Lone Weasel wrote:apart
I've asked gunloons many times what would happen if they
were suddenly granted an individual gun right under the
Second Amendment
thatfrom militia service, and none of them have the
slightest notion how
would work.
Well, I'm no gunloon, but I can answer the question:
It can't happen -- the amendments don't grant rights, nor
can they.
Then you don't have any individual gun right under the
Second Amendment, and never did.
You don't NEED any rights under any amendments
Then shut up and accept your fate, idiot.
I am still covered by my full array of natural rights and that
is always there, Constitution, Bill of rights, or not.
POINT PROVEN!!!!!!
Jim
Leif speaking: Claim whatever theoretical "natural rights" you
want, but keeping out of jail depends on staying within the legal
rights agreed upon by society collectively.
So you're just making up your supposed natural rights depending on
how you feel about things, eh Mr. Blecchh?
See Leif? We've beat the shit outa these gunloons. They don't even
want any Second Amendment rights, they want extremely selfish rights
that nobody else can know about until Jim just blurts one out when he
feels like it.
Like taking dibbs on stuff. Juvenile.
Leif speaking: As I've said before, if guns were a natural right, we'd
be born with an Uzi up our gazoozi.
You have the natural right to self defense
But only if you need to defend yourself. You don't have a natural right to
expect special weapons privileges 24/7/365/life if you're never actually
assaulted. It's not an unlimited right; it's a right based on need.
Because if you behave as if you're constantly under attack when you never
are, you've become a walking time bomb. And you don't have a right to pre-
emptively kill people just because you have an unreasonable fear of attack.
Like Harold Fish did, and he paid for it.
Anyway you don't have any special privilege to choose any weapon for self-
defense, especially where one isn't required.
and that means the right to
have the appropriate tool for the job.
Then you should probably start running now.
20 thousand years ago that would
have been rock hatchets and speers. Times change and so do the tools,
but the rights remain the same.
People had weapons rights 20,000 years ago? Show me the pictograph,
dumbass.
--
Yours truly,
The Lone Weasel
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The Second Amendment in court
- From: James Beck
- Re: The Second Amendment in court
- From: Peter Franks
- Re: The Second Amendment in court
- References:
- The Second Amendment in court
- From: Leif
- Re: The Second Amendment in court
- From: David Halpern
- Re: The Second Amendment in court
- From: The Lone Weasel
- Re: The Second Amendment in court
- From: jfma
- Re: The Second Amendment in court
- From: Leif
- Re: The Second Amendment in court
- From: Kent Finnell
- Re: The Second Amendment in court
- From: The Lone Weasel
- Re: The Second Amendment in court
- From: Leif
- Re: The Second Amendment in court
- From: The Lone Weasel
- Re: The Second Amendment in court
- From: Peter Franks
- Re: The Second Amendment in court
- From: The Lone Weasel
- Re: The Second Amendment in court
- From: James Beck
- Re: The Second Amendment in court
- From: The Lone Weasel
- Re: The Second Amendment in court
- From: James Beck
- Re: The Second Amendment in court
- From: Leif
- Re: The Second Amendment in court
- From: James Beck
- Re: The Second Amendment in court
- From: The Lone Weasel
- Re: The Second Amendment in court
- From: Leif
- Re: The Second Amendment in court
- From: James Beck
- The Second Amendment in court
- Prev by Date: Re: The Second Amendment in court
- Next by Date: Re: The Second Amendment in court
- Previous by thread: Re: The Second Amendment in court
- Next by thread: Re: The Second Amendment in court
- Index(es):