Re: The Second Amendment in court


jfma@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On 19 Dec 2006 16:05:51 GMT, The Lone Weasel <loneweasel@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

"David Halpern" <photonicbandgap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> said in
<news:IOWdnXBq0Y_3VxrYnZ2dnUVZ_qGjnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx> on Tue 19 Dec 2006
05:18:00a:
"Leif" <leifrakur2@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1166500269.714304.206590@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


Saul Cornell poses the question: "Gun Rights or Gun Wrongs: Will
the Courts Rewrite the Second Amendment?"

http://blog.oup.com:80/oupblog/2006/12/parker_and_the_.html

Saul Cornell is delusional.

Gunspeak for "he's a real historian

Like your discredited Bellisilles?


so we're gonna ruin his academic career
to teach him a lesson."

Bellisilles ruined it himself. Cornell is just another gun
control advocate that is attempting to justify his preconceptions.

Leif speaking: If you disagree with something Cornell said, why don't
you say specifically what it is and explain why you think he's wrong.
Name-calling's a waste of time.

.