Re: Ohio Senate Overrides Gun Law Veto (Ooops! Grabbers Lose Another One)


Bert Hyman wrote:
matttelles@xxxxxxxxxxx (Matt) wrote in
news:1165958312.239863.90200@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:


Bert Hyman wrote:
matttelles@xxxxxxxxxxx (Matt) wrote in
news:1165956684.308026.301920@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

Yes, and when they decide the REST of your local rights are
"confusing" they will wipe them out too.

What are "local rights"?

Well, Bert, you will find out,

So, you don't know?

I'm sure. Sooner or later, some state politician will decide to ban
all guns in the state, and you won't have a leg to stand on.

What's this particular incident have to do with that?

It's perfectly clear that state legislatures can, and often have,
passed laws that invalidate existing laws in lower-level
jurisdictions. This is just another instance.

Really. How interesting. And where did you find that in the
Constitution,
state or federal?


But hey, what do you care, because its the "right" thing to do.

Are you saying that it's the wrong thing to do?

Do you think that any local unit of government should be free to pass
whatever laws or ordinances it chooses, with no concern about how
they might conflict with laws that exist or might passed at the state
or even federal level?

I think you will learn to regret it. But hey, its your life.

Matt

.