Re: 2nd Amendment Case in D.C. Circuit of Appeals
- From: Peter Franks <none@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2006 09:54:24 -0800
The Lone Weasel wrote:
On Dec 7, 9:02 pm, "David Halpern" <photonicband...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Shelly Parker et al v. District of Columbia
http://www.forbes.com/home/feeds/ap/2006/12/07/ap3237185.html
If you really believe the Second Amendment grants a right to
individuals to have guns for their personal protection and it has
nothing to do with a right to field a well-regulated militia or to
serve in one, this should be your end-all case. It lays out your
argument in every detail.
Except that the suit is based on the false premise that Amendment II establishes a right:
"...these laws violate the Second Amendment, which establishes a fundamental individual right to bear arms..."
http://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/03-213.pdf
Amendment II does NOT establish a right, it declares a PROTECTION against government infringement.
.
- References:
- 2nd Amendment Case in D.C. Circuit of Appeals
- From: David Halpern
- Re: 2nd Amendment Case in D.C. Circuit of Appeals
- From: The Lone Weasel
- 2nd Amendment Case in D.C. Circuit of Appeals
- Prev by Date: Re: Gun Control's Twisted Outcome
- Next by Date: Re: If You Break Into Our Houses You Can Steal Our Guns
- Previous by thread: Re: 2nd Amendment Case in D.C. Circuit of Appeals
- Next by thread: Re: 2nd Amendment Case in D.C. Circuit of Appeals
- Index(es):