Re: Judges Have Second Amendment Rights- But Maybe Not You

In talk.politics.guns "The Lone Weasel" <loneweasel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


betweentheeyes wrote:


JUDGES CARRYING CONCEALED?!?!? What about Lee's "rights?"

There's nothing in the Second Amendment that grants judges a right to
arm their own militias,

We weren't talking about that, fatso. We were talking about his Second
Amendment right to keep and bear arms.

but if a judge'slife has been threatened that
might be a good reason for him/her to carry a weapon.

Are you sure about that Lee? What about ammo?


Where do you boys get this *** anyhow? How can you constantly confuse
arming well-regulated militias

We don't. Only neanderthals confuse the second amendment with the
right of governments.

Fat neanderthals.


& playing with guns for your personal
amusement?

So now you're claiming that the judge would only be carrying for
amusement?

How much have you had to drink today?

___________
"If we had effective gun control in this country, there's no
reason why police would need to carry bullets in their
weapons. They could collect bullets from a locked safe in
the patrol car when needed."
Lee "Jabba The Hutt" Harrison
_____________

You apparently have a problem with logic and common sense.
"The two are mutually exclusive, in case you didn't know.. *>LOL!<*"

- Kurt Harrington-Lochner,
attempting to define
LochnerLogic®
.