Re: "Gun activists get say at U.N. summit"

<editor@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:1151897487.307856.148590@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Or - more important here for the (alleged) purposes of the
conference - how will banning guns get them out of the hands of Third
World dictators whose armies mainly are for repressing their own
people?

I don't give a poopie. I just want them out of MY country.


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: "Gun activists get say at U.N. summit"
    ... Or - more important here for the purposes of the ... conference - how will banning guns get them out of the hands of Third ... World dictators whose armies mainly are for repressing their own ...
    (talk.politics.guns)
  • Re: "Gun activists get say at U.N. summit"
    ... conference - how will banning guns get them out of the hands of Third ... World dictators whose armies mainly are for repressing their own ...
    (talk.politics.guns)
  • Re: 2005 OOC Midseason Report: Conference by Conference
    ... > With the season about half over, let's look at how each conference has fared ... For the purposes of this list, ... I've tried to determine their best OOC win so far. ... > OOC Games left: 7 ...
    (rec.sport.football.college)
  • Re: "Gun activists get say at U.N. summit"
    ... Are you a gun banner? ... Do you think banning guns will stop criminals from getting guns? ... Or - more important here for the purposes of the ...
    (talk.politics.guns)
Quantcast