Re: Harold Fish Murder Trial Begins This Week
- From: "Kent Finnell" <kentfinn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 08:48:57 -0500
"SaPeIsMa" <SaPeIsMa@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
Yup !To say nothing about a month's worth of spelling, punctuation, and grammar
Lots of stupid assumptions and worthless specculations.
flames fodder. Our boy Bob totally lost it in his rant below.
Note to Bob: Re-medicate, focus, try thinking for a change (or for once in
I'm off to pick up the Sunday paper and do the laundry. I will be armed,
prepared, and safe. Odds are that I won't have to display the revolver,
much less draw and fire it.
"Bob" <bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
You are right, Assumtions, speculation, prjections... etc. etc. but by
know means, unreasonable, or beyond what a reasonable person could have,
or did do in this circumstance.
Second, Weaponds are used to kill, injur, wound and cause great physicla
harm to people, Expecially pistols, which are designed not for hunting,
but close range hand to hand combat between people (human beings). i.e.
rifles, and such as designed for hunting, asault rifles are designed
for? you know... illing people. In this case we are talking about a
handgun, a 9 mm semi-atuomatic which is capable of shooting its entire
magazine in less than 10 seconds. It is not accurate beyond 100 Yards,
and that is a great overestimate, it is more acurate in less than 100
feet, and very accurate at 50 feet or less, and to say what kind of
damage it can do at a range of 10 feet or less is obsurd, when we are
talking about the human body, with no armour protection, think of it
like jello, and your insides, well you get the point, not much to put
back together after 3 direct shots, and 1 would most likely knock you
down, again though that is speculation, but not beyond reason.
I am again speculating, but what other means are firearms, pistols, at
least in the 9mm semi-auto range used for, other than to kill? i.e. to
intimidate, to empower oneself, to provoke... what would a 9mm fired at
you, or around you at your loving animals, or friends cause a reasonable
person to do.. speculate.. make you scared? (maybe), make you angry
(most likely), cause you to ask why, confront, and seek an answer to the
reason (most definitely).. thats just what reasonable people do.. What
would you have done being armed, and ready to protect yourself, if Mr.
Fish, had fired in your vacinity? Speculate... shot back, hid, and shot
back again, Mr. Fish would have shot also, and well you get the idea..
again a reasonable assumtion. You are right, all we have left is
assumtions, projections, and what we would do. Rather than say I am
wrong in my assumtions, lets hear what you would have done in the
victims shoes? Now that would be most interesting to read, but bub,
stupid, and lier are far from what I have said, as opinion, my thoughts,
and as better said projections are more accurate.. at least I think so.
"If violent crime is to be curbed, it is only the intended
victim who can do it. The felon does not fear the police,
and he fears neither judge nor jury. Therefore what he
must be taught to fear is his victim."
.. . Jeff Cooper
Kent Finnell, from the Music City, USA
- Prev by Date: Re: Where is it, Lying Loon?
- Next by Date: Re: A Model, American Firearms Policy (Long)
- Previous by thread: Re: Harold Fish Murder Trial Begins This Week
- Next by thread: Re: Harold Fish Murder Trial Begins This Week