Re: armed passengers vs 9-11 hijackers
- From: "Dr. Dickie" <Dr_Dickie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 12:29:11 -0400
"Morton Davis" <antikerry@xxxxxx> wrote in message
<datalines@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
I'm sick and tired of those politically correct, city-slicker cableDespite sounding rather nutty - you are right. Americans used to carry on
news anchor people showing how good Americans died trying to fight
those sick Islamic terrorist hijackers before they crashed on the
ground and/or towers!
Analyze this situation using the famous "But-for" legal causation
If good responsible American CCW holders were able to pack their
the so-called safe Airplanes, then perhaps some passengers would of
able to defeat these Islamic terrorists firing their guns and perhaps
saving the planes
and the other passengers!
Airline companies and some of the US Air Marshal system (there weren't
any at that time) were negligent in protecting
these passengers from their deaths but the proximate (legal) cause is
because of what
these Islamic terrorists did.
Write these sissy, pacivist news anchor people, and tell them
citizens should be able to bring their pistols anywhere in the USA and
aircraft and so did pilots.
I am always reminded of Archie Bunker's solution to the hijacking planes
problem in the '70s. He said rather than checking passengers for guns, they
should GIVE everybody getting on a plane a gun. Then let the nuts try to
Skepticult member in good standing #394-00596-438
Poking kooks with a pointy stick
Repeal the 17th amendment; let's reinstate the proper checks and balances
and end mob rule in my lifetime!
- Prev by Date: Re: One Question about Gun Control
- Next by Date: Re: Kicked off Jury for being an NRA member - how convenient
- Previous by thread: Re: armed passengers vs 9-11 hijackers
- Next by thread: Re: armed passengers vs 9-11 hijackers