Re: do we need to boycott Browning & FN?

Bert Hyman wrote:
In news:xMoMf.48400$bW.22400@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx "Head Shot"
<HeadShot@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Morton Davis wrote:
Unions are part of why a Coke that cost a nickle when I was a boy
now costs a dollar.

Unions are also why a Toyota is 10x better than a comparably priced
Chevy or Ford. They put more into the cars because they give less
to the unions.

It takes two parties to sign a contract.

It's a shotgun wedding, so to speak. The Union refuses to work, and the
company is bound by the NLRA to continue to negotiate. So the union can
bankrupt the company by stopping them from manufacturing anything or
supplying a service. No income, company folds. National Labor Relations
Act is pro-union; what balances it out by protecting the corporation?
Unions were necessary back in the "Norma Rae" days, but now it's ridiculous.
Have you ever wondered why Unions are always sponsoring Democrats; and why
Democrats are always proponents of robbing from the rich to give to the
poor? Unions and Democrats are both Socialist. And Socialism = something
for nothing. I am not going to tell you Republicans are that much better;
but I would suggest you spend 20 minutes reading the Libertarian Party
Platform. http://www.lp.org/issues/platform_all.shtml



--
______________________________________________________
The sniper has special abilities, training and equipment. His job is to
deliver discriminatory highly accurate rifle fire against enemy targets,
which cannot be engaged successfully by the rifleman because of
range, size, location, fleeting nature, or visibility.

** FM 23-10 Sniper Field Manual


.