Re: "Hamas With M16 Rifles?"

In talk.politics.guns grey_ghost471-newsgroups@xxxxxxxxx (Mustapha, P)
wrote:

>"Jik Bombo" <eat.***@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in news:KHhDf.7365$oG.1262
>@dukeread09:
>
>>
>> "Mustapha, P" <grey_ghost471-newsgroups@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:Xns975AA282A9696Wereofftoseethewizrd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>> A lot of people are going to die in the near
>>> future becuase Iran is seeking a nuclear weapon.
>>
>>
>> I believe that you are right.
>>
>> The only question is specifically who that "lot of people" are . . . . .
>>
>> Better them than us.
>>
>>
>
>
>Careful bombing of the Iranian facilities will reduce the death toll
>considerably to those at the site.
>
>It occurred to me that successive bombing with nukes creating larger and
>larger craters will eventually get down to the hardened areas.

I'd like to see a combination of a GBU-28 and a Trident II. I have a
plan where simultaneous missile attacks begin at a longitude of about
35 degrees about 1500 miles on each side of 30 degrees north latitude.
At a specified interval, we commence another simultaneous barrage one
degree east, then another, then another, until we create a
self-sustaining shock wave that peels off the earth's crust from Mecca
to Afghanistan.

The added bonus would be, of course, that all that oil would be closer
to the surface, easy pickin's for our Exxon shock troops to recover.

.

Quantcast