Re: John R. Lott A PHOTO-FIX FOR VOTING
- From: "Matt" <matttelles@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 27 Sep 2005 14:30:50 -0700
SaPeIsMa wrote:
> "Matt" <matttelles@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1127850435.607431.286390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > SaPeIsMa wrote:
> >> "Matt" <matttelles@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> >> news:1127829012.849073.64800@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> >
> >> > Cole Firearms Inc. wrote:
> >> >> http://johnrlott.tripod.com/op-eds/NYPPhotoVotingID.html
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Published Friday, September 23, 2005, in New York Post
> >> >>
> >> >> A PHOTO-FIX FOR VOTING
> >> >>
> >> >> By John R. Lott, Jr. and Mario Villarreal
> >> >
> >> > Not that I particularly disagree with him about photo-id's being a more
> >> > useful solution (although they are just as easy to counterfeit as
> >> > anything else), but WHY would I care what John Lott, an economist who
> >> > knows nothing about voting, says on the matter?
> >> >
> >> > This is really no better than listening to Snoop Dogg hold forth on how
> >> > to win in Iraq.
> >> >
> >> > Matt
> >> >
> >>
> >> How much more than him do YOU know about voting ?
> >
> > Probably nothing. I didn't say I did. I asked why I should listen to
> > HIM, not why he should listen to me.
> >
>
> You don't have to listen to ANYONE, Lott included
> If you don't want to listen to him, don't !
> If you want to listen to him, do !
> He wrote an opinion article.
> If you're curious about his O-P-I-N-I-O-N, then read the article.
> If not read something or nothing else.
>
>
>
>
> >> And what exactly is the standard you espouse to judge "kowledge about
> >> voting" ?
> >
> > I don't recall espousing. I said I didn't disagree with him, as a
> > personal opinion, but that he was in no position technically to make
> > such judgements. I'm only published in areas I have expertise in. If I
> > wrote a book about, say, economics, people would fry me justifiably. So
> > why are you listening to Lott about voting?
> >
> .
> He is in EXACTLY the same position to express HIS opinion as you are to
> express YOUR opinion
> No more, no less.
> The difference is that he's got enough people interested in reading his
> opinion that he gets paid to express it.
>
>
> Bottom line is that you're bitching for the sake of bitching.
Have you considered seeing someone about your anger issues? They are
getting rather severe.
Matt
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: John R. Lott A PHOTO-FIX FOR VOTING
- From: SaPeIsMa
- Re: John R. Lott A PHOTO-FIX FOR VOTING
- References:
- John R. Lott A PHOTO-FIX FOR VOTING
- From: Cole Firearms Inc.
- Re: John R. Lott A PHOTO-FIX FOR VOTING
- From: SaPeIsMa
- Re: John R. Lott A PHOTO-FIX FOR VOTING
- From: Matt
- Re: John R. Lott A PHOTO-FIX FOR VOTING
- From: SaPeIsMa
- John R. Lott A PHOTO-FIX FOR VOTING
- Prev by Date: Re: Guns possessed by citizens and the State
- Next by Date: Re: John R. Lott A PHOTO-FIX FOR VOTING
- Previous by thread: Re: John R. Lott A PHOTO-FIX FOR VOTING
- Next by thread: Re: John R. Lott A PHOTO-FIX FOR VOTING
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|