Re: Off the point, was: on the point
- From: "betweentheeyes" <betweentheeyes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 18:28:40 -0400
"Susan Williams" <SWilliams07171964II@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:n0fhj1lue1ojlsh18j2d5m3omnqu6124vh@xxxxxxxxxx
> On Mon, 26 Sep 2005 12:20:26 GMT, "betweentheeyes"
> <betweentheeyes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>><wasthatamoose@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>news:1127695375.377913.153300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>I usually surf<snip>
>>
>>Keep surf'n, spend some time on www.dictionary.com and input the word
>>topic.
>>Post here what you find.
>
> Why do you still believe all non-Catholics must die, Betweentheeyes
> Jesuit? Why do you attack people who didn't like your friends posting
> that all non-Catholics must die? Why do you pretend to be their
> psychiatrists and pharmacists when they don't like such posts?
Suzie, where have you been? I asked your friend and cohort Nancy Luft and
she wouldn't answer where you were.
Suzie, Suzie, Suzie .. you're starting out on fire! ... Did you ever post
the list of your prescriptions? Are you of Oriental heritage?
Com'on Suzie, help me out and list those prescriptions now, we'll get to the
illegal drug list later.
.
- References:
- on the point
- From: wasthatamoose
- Re:Off the point, was: on the point
- From: betweentheeyes
- Re: Off the point, was: on the point
- From: Susan Williams
- on the point
- Prev by Date: 2 States, 22 Observations
- Next by Date: Re: John R. Lott A PHOTO-FIX FOR VOTING
- Previous by thread: Re: Off the point, was: on the point
- Next by thread: NSW AUSTRALIA NEW GUN LAWS
- Index(es):