Re: The next Supreme Court Nominee BETTER NOT BE A WOMAN

On 27 Sep 2005 05:28:02 -0700, "David Halpern"
<photonicbandgap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>DAMN'T these appointments are too damn important.
>
>All Sandra Day O'Connor could do is change her views on jurisprudence
>from one side to another.
>
>They can't make up their MINDS.
>
>Now if he appointed someone like Clarence Thomas that would be awesome
>but no DAMN WOMEN.
>
>"Bush, when asked about his next nominee, said "I will pick a person
>who can do the job. But I am mindful that diversity is one of the
>strengths of the country." The president is under pressure from many
>quarters -- including his wife -- to pick a woman or a minority for the
>seat of Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, who is retiring."
>
>
>Who cares what Laura Bush thinks....we didn't vote for her ass.
>
>We are not going to lose our damn gun rights because some woman was
>appointed to the Supreme Court.

I wouldn't object to either Brown or Batchelder, both are strict
constructionists.

Bill Smith
.