Re: Off the point, was: on the point
- From: Susan Williams <SWilliams07171964II@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 23:28:22 -0400
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005 12:20:26 GMT, "betweentheeyes"
<betweentheeyes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
><wasthatamoose@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>news:1127695375.377913.153300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>I usually surf<snip>
>
>Keep surf'n, spend some time on www.dictionary.com and input the word topic.
>Post here what you find.
Why do you still believe all non-Catholics must die, Betweentheeyes
Jesuit? Why do you attack people who didn't like your friends posting
that all non-Catholics must die? Why do you pretend to be their
psychiatrists and pharmacists when they don't like such posts?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Off the point, was: on the point
- From: betweentheeyes
- Re: Off the point, was: on the point
- References:
- on the point
- From: wasthatamoose
- Re:Off the point, was: on the point
- From: betweentheeyes
- on the point
- Prev by Date: Re: Yank troops need 250,000 bullets per kill!
- Next by Date: Re: Schumer armed
- Previous by thread: Re:Off the point, was: on the point
- Next by thread: Re: Off the point, was: on the point
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|