Rick Stanley CCW LICENSING IS ILLEGAL
- From: "Cole Firearms Inc." <colefirearms11@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 02:27:12 GMT
Rick Stanley Constitutional Activist Phone: 303-329-0481 E-mail: rick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
We the People Scoop 09/7/05
========================================================= WE THE PEOPLE SCOOP - TO EXPOSE! ** ** Visit the website: http://www.stanley2002.org ** ** Like the Scoop? Forward it to everyone you know! ** =========================================================
OPINION RELEASE: CCW LICENSING IS ILLEGAL
----- Forwarded message from donhamrick@xxxxxxxxx -----
HERE'S MY 2 CENTS WORTH!
I admit I am a bit ignorant of the core issues amongst you fine people in this exchange of opinions. But I have anecdotal information that might add more substance to Peter Mancus' arguing points. I think the real core issue amongst all of you is the subject of Local Control versus dependency upon the federal government for our safety and security. I have a lot to say about that subject.
Early on in my learning curve on the Second Amendment I thought I was doing the right thing when I paid for the Arkansas CCW application fee and submitted my application for the CCW. I got my CCW license. However, I did not have the opportunity to go about the county or the State with my Glock 17 high capacicity clip concealed because of my travels as a U.S. merchant seaman. I continued my studies into the Second Amendment and the politics about it.
I eventually learned the the CCW licensing scheme unconstitutionally convorts the Second Amendment right into a revokable privilege. I mailed my letter to the governor of Arkansas with my CCW license enclosed, cut in half, stating the the CCW is an unconstitutional and an illegal document under the Second Amendment. This voluntary relinquishing of my CCW is permanently on record.
Time and life goes on. I initiate another Second Amendment venture with the U.S. Coast Guard that nets me a criminal investigation through the Naval Criminal Investigative Service just because I emailed an article that I wrote to the Coast Guard talking about what murder victims see just before they are shot dead by criminals. That Coast Guard officer thought I threatened his life just because I exercised my First Amendment right of free speech and to petition the government for redress of grievances.
That triggered my litigious saga through the federal courts in 2002 up to the present day. I have two court orders compelling me to pay the filing fees of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit. Those two court documents prove, in my opinion, extortion by 5 federal judges, included among them is the Supreme Court nominee Judge John Roberts.
Now, the DC Code has a law for citizen's arrest. Knowing that the U.S. Marshals Service protects federal judges I emailed an inquiry to the U.S. Marshals Service asking for help and advice on the appropriateness of making a citizen's arrest of Judge John Roberts on the basis of the two court documents being evidence of extortion in violation of federal law exempting merchant seamen from paying filings fees.
The U.S. Marshals Service in DC sent a U.S. Marshal from Little Rock Arkansas to my mothers residence where I was visiting at the time (and my home of record because I am perpetually traveling as a merchant seaman) just at the time I was taking a bus to Little Rock. I was informed of the visit. As a dutiful citizen I go to the federal building in Little Rock (6:00PM) to arrange to meet with that U.S. Marshal on his return trip to Little. We meet. We talk. He advises me not to go to DC. I advise him I am going to DC with the intent of visiting the U.S. Marshals Service in DC to ask my questions. All my assurances that I did not have any inention of assualting the judge went in one ear and out the other with Marshal Dupri. In his mind I was guilty of planning to do something criminal. Ohhh, government paranoia runs deep. He proved this when I told him of my Greyhound route to DC. He said "Now you are giving me something I can use."
I reached Richmond, Virginia only to find Marshal Campos from DC and some Richmond police officers waiting for me to step off the bus. This was about 2:00AM. This Marshal interrogated me, playing a dual role of good cop bad cop for such a duration that my voice went hoarse. At that moment he ended the interrogation and let me go.
He let me go because they had nothing on me and were on a fishing expedition because I was exercising my rights to the fullest compacity under the Ninth and Tenth Amendments - enforcing the balance of power under citizen's arrest. But, according to the U.S. Marshals Service's reaction to my inquiry I am led to believe that federal judges are above the law.
I have subsequently filed a motion against the U.S. Marshals Service and all federal law enforcement agencies for a permanent injunction prohibiting them from harassing or investigating me on the basis of exercising constitutional rights.
During the interrogation in Richmond, Virginia by the Marshall Campos from DC he revealed to me that I did have an Arkansas CCW license and that I voluntarily relinquished it. He asked me why? I told him that I don't need a CCW to possess and carry a firearm. That the Second Amendment is my authority to possess a firearm. He patted me down for a weapon at that point. I was grinning at the absurdity.
Marshal Campos told me that the Second Amendmnt is about the State's right to arm the militia. He also told me that there is nothing I can say to persuade him that the Second Amendment is an individual right. I just stared at him grinning at his ignorance on the Second Amendment. I remaind silent on the point because of my suspicion that he was attempting to entice me into committing disorderly conduct from which he can then place me under arrest.
I would later print and spiral bind at Kinkos the U.S. Department of Justice's Memorand Opinion on the Second Amendment that was internally released on August 24, 2004 an FedEx it to Marshal Campos to prove his ignorance on the Second Amendment. That was my sweet revenge on him.
He told me that every federal law enforcement agency in DC was looking for me in DC. He warned me to stay out of DC for awhile to let him smooth things over. I refused. I told him that I'm going to DC to visit the U.S. Marshals Service office in DC.
After the interrogation was over he thought I was going to go to Norfolk, Virginia, that he percieved me as agreeing to stay out of DC. After we all dispersed I went to the Ticket Counter of Greyhound and bought a round-trip ticket to Wilmington, Delaware. I had a union vacation paycheck to cash and I wanted to find out for myself if I could cash it at the bank it is drawn on. That's my act of civil disobedience with a chuckle.
Well, corresponding with Marshal Campos his emails were more like an attempt to coerce me into submission to his will. He had a condescending manner in his emails which insulted my dignity and intelligence. The manager of the Greyhound bus station in Richmond apparently reported to Marshal Campos that I did not go to Norfolk but to Wilmington, Delaware. The emails from Marshal Campos were most laughable trying to hold me to this alleged agreement. He was actually attempting to get me to agree to not exercise my right to travel where I want just because he percieved me with an intent of doing something criminal even when I provided him proof that I my intent was that of a concerned citizen exercising constitutional rights.
Everyone of you talk about a disarmed society. But have any of you ever gone head to head with federal law enforcement on the subject of such Second Amendment and Tenth Amendment rights (citizen's arrest)?? Give the federal government an inch of your rights they will hold you to a yardstick of subservience. It is because of this method of government bullying that we must never given an inch of our rights and freedoms. Congress is taking our rights and freedoms at will and my fear is a future civil war. Hurricane Katrina has pushed us toward that end. What follows is my advice to President Bush and to Congress:
Hurricane Katrina Destruction of New Orleans Proves the Need to Abolish the Department of Homeland Security and Restore Local Control! Abolish Department of Homeland Security! Abolish FEMA!! Elevate Stature of State Defense Forces/State Guards Elevate Stature of Unorganized Militia
The mayor of New Orleans could have taken precautions without an addictive dependency upon the United States Government or the Department of Homeland Security or FEMA to effectively evacuate the people. The mayor, the sheriff, or a district judge under Lousiana law could have called out the Lousiana State Guard, the Louisiana Unorganized Militia. If the mayor of New Orleans failed to take proper action then the sheriff or a district judge could have ordered out the militia forces under the command of the Senior Officer of a militia command, be it the Lousiana State Guard, the Lousiana Unorganized Militia (since the Lousiana Army National Guard is or was in Iraq). This disaster was exacerbated by the Louisiana State and local government depending and relying upon the Federal Government to come to their rescue when The citizen's of Lousiana themselves could more easily, and more quickly, rescue themselves under a political, social, and legal ideology of Local Control with the proper balance of powers found in the Tenth Amendmet to the Bill of Rights.
State laws were already on the books to make this act of local control happen. The governor has or was supposed to have personal military and naval advisors on his staff as mandated by State law. It is clear the mayor and the governor failed to do their duty under Louisian law in effecting a properly executed rescue of the people while maintaining law and order by failing to call out the Louisiana State Guard, or the unorganized militias!!
Will this be the national turning point in restoring the State Defense Force/State Guards and the unorganized militia to their rightful position in their proper role for law and order? I hope so!
29 Lousiana Revised Statutes ? 8. Senior officer of command ordering out forces
A. Whenever, under the circumstances mentioned in R.S. 29:7, it is not possible to communicate with the governor or the adjutant general, the senior officer of a command, upon the request of a mayor, a sheriff, or a district judge, shall order out the forces under his command, or any part thereof, for the protection of the community. As soon as possible, the senior officer shall report his action and the facts to the governor, the adjutant general, and his immediate commanding officer.
B. When the troops have arrived at the appointed place, the commanding officer shall receive and execute the general instructions that are given him by the mayor, the sheriff, or the district judge. These instructions shall be in writing if practicable. (Acts 1974, No. 622, ?1.)
29 Lousiana Revised Statutes ? 17. Governor's personal staff
The governor may have a personal military and naval staff, the members of which are not in the national guard. Acts 1974, No. 622, ?1.
29 Lousiana Revised Statutes ? 25. Manner of calling for duty
A. Officers and enlisted men may be called for duty in any of the following ways:
(1) By stating the substance of the order or by reading it to him in person
or over the telephone.
(2) By radio or television communication.
(3) By leaving a copy of the order with a person of suitable age and discretion at his last known place of residence or business.
(4) By sending a copy of the order or a notice containing the substance thereof by mail, telegraph, or facsimile transmission directed to him at his last known place of residence or business or to the post office nearest thereto.
B. The call may be given by an officer or noncommissioned officer.
Acts 1974, No. 622, ?1; Acts 1992, No. 530, ?1, eff. July 1, 1992.
--- Peter Mancus <pmancus@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> There is some merit to what you are selling but I am not buying.
>> You sold out. You knowingly acquiesced into reducing the right to a
>> privilege. That is darn near unpardonable, especially from one as
>> learned as
>> you. You cannot be trusted to sell out more, and/or to sell out others,
>> should you ever wield real power.
>> The above is not personal. It is conceptual, and you will never
>> me otherwise.
>> When I deleted you from my address book, I wondered if my thoughts
>> you were similar to what a Founding Father told those who felt somewhat
>> you do, paraphrased: If you have not the stomach for the fight, then
>> us; go lick your chains; may you remain comfortable with them.
>> You carry a gun--and you carry a permit that authorizes you to carry
>> gun. You are a model for a prescription for disaster should your view
>> No one needs a permit to carry a gun. The Second is there nation
>> Down deep, you, apparently do not really believe that; otherwise,
>> would not ask permission. You asked for permission.
>> Do you ask for permission to go to church?
>> To vote?
>> To write an op-ed?
>> To travel?
>> Most people believe what they do, not what they say they believe.
>> You are on a plantation and you are in self-denial. Your excellent
>> allowed you to come to terms with your self-denial and your
>> rationalizations. Too bad. What a waste.
>> --Peter Mancus
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Clayton E. Cramer" <clayton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> To: "Dieter H. Dahmen" <ddahmen4@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: "Peter Mancus" <pmancus@xxxxxxxxxxx>; "John Wolfgram"
>> <johnwolfgram@xxxxxxxxxxx>; <rblume@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; < dbrennan@xxxxxxxxx>;
>> <editor-cws@xxxxxxxxxxx>; <rick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <peter57@xxxxxxx>;
>> <pgolis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <pgullixson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
>> <pamstanley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <jmarch@xxxxxxxxxxx>;
>> <jrogins@xxxxxxxxxxx>; <rishidev@xxxxxxx>; <ki5ss@xxxxxxxxx>;
>> <liberty89@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <governor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
>> <adubay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <lwmclaughlin@xxxxxxxx>;
>> <bev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
>> <brett222_us@xxxxxxxxx>; <mrfocalplane@xxxxxxxxx>;
>> <superstocks1@xxxxxxxx>; "MICHAEL KAWANA" <mk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
>> GROVE" <flierrrr@xxxxxxx>; "MICHAEL BODINE" <mfbodine@xxxxxx>; "MATT
>> <mja582@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "LES GADULA" <photosbyles@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Sunday, September 04, 2005 9:50 PM
>> Subject: Re: could you all remove me from this list?
========================================================= Disclaimer: Information shared in the Stanley Scoop is not necessarily the opinion of the editor or staff. It is shared for information purposes only and it is recommended that you come to your own conclusions. ========================================================= Live Free or Die! Liberty in our Lifetime! We the People Scoop http://www.stanley2002.org Reply to: rick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Listen to: Standing Up for America Radio Show with Rick Stanley Every Sunday, 6pm MST for 1 hour On Truth Radio Network to listen, click here: http://www.truthradio.com Sponsored by: Stanley Fasteners and Shop Supply http://www.stanleyfasteners.com
Also check out The Revolutionary Coalition! This group is working to unite all third parties (making up 60% of Americans) into one SUPER THIRD PARTY!
On Yahoo groups at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TheRevolutionaryCoalition
This group has a single line platform: "To defend our (Natural) God-given, unalienable, Constitutionally protected and guaranteed rights."
Subscribe by sending email to: therevolutionarycoalition-subscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Also see our main website at: http://www.therevco.org
If you wish to unsubscribe from We the People Scoop, change your email address, or add an email address, please visit the automated list management at: http://lists.stanley2002.org/mailman/listinfo/medialist or http://lists.stanley2002.org/mailman/listinfo/scooplist or for personal attention, please send a message to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with the subject "unsubscribe" from the email address you received it at. Be aware that you may be receiving mail forwarded from a group, in which case you may have to visit http://groups.yahoo.com to unsubscribe. Please also note that mail sent to our "reply to:" address, scoop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx are usually ignored....
_______________________________________________ Scooplist mailing list Scooplist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.stanley2002.org/mailman/listinfo/scooplist
-- "A privilege can be taken away at a whim by anyone, a Right is eternal." -- Rev. Shawn Cole
- Prev by Date: Re: Whoa!
- Next by Date: Re: Whoa!
- Previous by thread: Re: S&W says "ouch"
- Next by thread: "Ubiquity of guns a tragic misstep of the US"