Re: Are Guns Really a Friend of Freedom?
- From: "Scout" <4guns@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 17:59:29 -0400
"Stalin" <Stalin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:88a23b1e1005c2ebc310dde27cc004f0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Jim Yanik said:
>
>>I'm suggesting that individuals and perhaps entire units switch sides and
>
>>no longer be part of the US military.
>>Or just refuse to act for the oppressive government.
>
> Once again, consider the implications of what you are saying. Politicizing
> the military is pretty much a guarantee of dictatorship.
Oh, the contrary, preventing the military from rising up against
dictatorships is pretty much a guarantee of dictatorship. After all,
consider this, most dictatorships are based on control of the military and
hence the sole control of military might.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Are Guns Really a Friend of Freedom?
- From: Stalin
- Re: Are Guns Really a Friend of Freedom?
- References:
- Are Guns Really a Friend of Freedom?
- From: Stalin
- Re: Are Guns Really a Friend of Freedom?
- From: Jim Yanik
- Re: Are Guns Really a Friend of Freedom?
- From: Stalin
- Re: Are Guns Really a Friend of Freedom?
- From: Jim Yanik
- Re: Are Guns Really a Friend of Freedom?
- From: Stalin
- Are Guns Really a Friend of Freedom?
- Prev by Date: Re: Are Guns Really a Friend of Freedom?
- Next by Date: Re: Are Guns Really a Friend of Freedom?
- Previous by thread: Re: Are Guns Really a Friend of Freedom?
- Next by thread: Re: Are Guns Really a Friend of Freedom?
- Index(es):