Re: Are Guns Really a Friend of Freedom?
- From: "Stalin" <Stalin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 11:32:36 -0400
Jim Yanik said:
>But it still all began with a civilian militia.
I don't deny that. But the deciding factor was an army of
professionally-trained soldiers fighting in neat ranks and using virtually
the same tactics as their opponents.
>Why couldn't a Second Revolution begin the same way,and have well-trained
>elements of the US military join them later,bringing expertise and
heavier weapons?
Are you suggesting that the US military start overtly interfering in
politics? If so, be careful what you wish for.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Are Guns Really a Friend of Freedom?
- From: Scout
- Re: Are Guns Really a Friend of Freedom?
- From: Jim Yanik
- Re: Are Guns Really a Friend of Freedom?
- References:
- Are Guns Really a Friend of Freedom?
- From: Stalin
- Re: Are Guns Really a Friend of Freedom?
- From: Jim Yanik
- Are Guns Really a Friend of Freedom?
- Prev by Date: Re: Are Guns Really a Friend of Freedom?
- Next by Date: Re: Are Guns Really a Friend of Freedom?
- Previous by thread: Re: Are Guns Really a Friend of Freedom?
- Next by thread: Re: Are Guns Really a Friend of Freedom?
- Index(es):