Re: Senate votes for mandatory child safety locks

On Sat, 30 Jul 2005 23:49:25 +0000, Jim Yanik wrote:

> Ever wonder why all the anti-gun groups OPPOSE gun safety courses in
> schools?

Because if kids are exposed to gun safety classes, some of them might grow
up to be shooters.

The Brady Bunch would rather that they be dead.

> Especially since they -claim- to be for gun safety and saving children.
> The NRA spends more on gun safety than ALL the anti-gun groups together.
>
> That's something to consider.

It's not hard, considering that the anti-gun groups, together, don't spend
a dime on gun safety.

You'd think that Americans for Gun Safety, at least, would have offered a
single gun safety class, somewhere, sometime. After all, they claim to be
the "common sense" compromise.

But they haven't.

--
Is it just or reasonable, that most voices against the main end of
government should enslave the less number that would be free? More just
it is, doubtless, if it come to force, that a less number compel a
greater to retain, which can be no wrong to them, their liberty, than
that a greater number, for the pleasure of their baseness, compel a less
most injuriously to be their fellow slaves. They who seek nothing but
their own just liberty, have always the right to win it, whenever they
have the power, be the voices never so numerous that oppose it.
- John Milton

.