Re: Animals Have No Rights
- From: Blue Wood <blue@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 23:28:29 +0100
ontheroad wrote:
"Blue Wood" <blue@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:5c3mm9F2v7155U1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxontheroad wrote:Yes fool, I eat meat. there is a difference between us though that is apparently too hard for your"ontheoutside" <twinks_1011@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:1180324539.939386.11870@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxI guess you eat meat, that you find convenient and entertaining. I also guess that you kill them (by proxy)without any repercussions to you.On May 27, 2:09 pm, geo...@xxxxxxxx (Geoff Miller) wrote:=======================Animals don't have rights. The concept of "rights" isAre you nuts?? What kind of egotistical maniac are you..your sense of
not inherent, but is an intellectual construct created
by man to define relationships within his own species.
All you hysterical broads can shut up now.
Geoff
superiority is certainly often typical of men, unfortunately. Not all
thank heavens!
Then explain what rights you think animals have. Keep in mind that you kill them willy-nilly for your
selfish convenience and entertainment. How can they have rights if you can kill them without and repurcussions?
=======================
pea-brain to understand.
That was a yes then.
Humans have rights, but are killed (euthanasia / capital punishment / war, etc.) This is often decided after balancing the interests of all the parties involved; in the same way we can decide to kill an animal based on the interests of those involved:Analogies are real really hard for you aren't they. The differences are enormous and the
============================
example you give are not even in the same category as the animals you kill. there
are many repercussions if you kill a person, even by accident. Until there are the same
for killing animals means they do not have any rights. You and the OP prove that by contributing
to the billions upon billions of animals that die \for your usenet entertainment, hypocrite.
Is it, for example, a greater interest that you eat meat for aesthetic pleasure or the interest of the animal not to suffer and die?================
It's to live fool.
No; I am sure it is aesthetic pleasure.
Just like you. Only you kill more animals than I do to
live, killer.
The digfference? YOU claim to care about animals. YOU claim to do something
to avoid killing animals. You and the OP have yet to prove that you do anything of the sort. And,
it's particularly hard to believe as long as you are posting to usenet for your entertainment, killing animals for no
reason at all, hypocrite.
Consider all the interests.then you should not be eating veggies and posting to internet, hypocrite. I suggest you consider YOUR
==============
impact, killer.
I thought it wasn't worth responding to you; and I've been proved right. - If you cut out the baseless insults;l you have nothing to say.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Animals Have No Rights
- From: ontheroad
- Re: Animals Have No Rights
- References:
- Re: Animals Have No Rights
- From: ontheroad
- Re: Animals Have No Rights
- Prev by Date: Your thoughts on animal testing?
- Next by Date: Re: Animals Have No Rights
- Previous by thread: Re: Animals Have No Rights
- Next by thread: Re: Animals Have No Rights
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|