Re: Animals Have No Rights
- From: "ontheroad" <stop@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 16:26:20 GMT
"Blue Wood" <blue@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:5c3mm9F2v7155U1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
ontheroad wrote:Yes fool, I eat meat. there is a difference between us though that is
"ontheoutside" <twinks_1011@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1180324539.939386.11870@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On May 27, 2:09 pm, geo...@xxxxxxxx (Geoff Miller) wrote:
Animals don't have rights. The concept of "rights" is
not inherent, but is an intellectual construct created
by man to define relationships within his own species.
All you hysterical broads can shut up now.
Geoff
Are you nuts?? What kind of egotistical maniac are you..your sense of=======================
superiority is certainly often typical of men, unfortunately. Not all
thank heavens!
Then explain what rights you think animals have. Keep in mind that you
kill them willy-nilly for your
selfish convenience and entertainment. How can they have rights if you
can kill them without and repurcussions?
I guess you eat meat, that you find convenient and entertaining. I also
guess that you kill them (by proxy)without any repercussions to you.
=======================
apparently too hard for your
pea-brain to understand.
Humans have rights, but are killed (euthanasia / capital punishment / war,Analogies are real really hard for you aren't they. The differences are
etc.) This is often decided after balancing the interests of all the
parties involved; in the same way we can decide to kill an animal based on
the interests of those involved:
============================
enormous and the
example you give are not even in the same category as the animals you kill.
there
are many repercussions if you kill a person, even by accident. Until there
are the same
for killing animals means they do not have any rights. You and the OP
prove that by contributing
to the billions upon billions of animals that die \for your usenet
entertainment, hypocrite.
Is it, for example, a greater interest that you eat meat for aesthetic================
pleasure or the interest of the animal not to suffer and die?
It's to live fool. Just like you. Only you kill more animals than I do to
live, killer.
The digfference? YOU claim to care about animals. YOU claim to do
something
to avoid killing animals. You and the OP have yet to prove that you do
anything of the sort. And,
it's particularly hard to believe as long as you are posting to usenet for
your entertainment, killing animals for no
reason at all, hypocrite.
then you should not be eating veggies and posting to internet, hypocrite. I
Consider all the interests.
==============
suggest you consider YOUR
impact, killer.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Animals Have No Rights
- From: Blue Wood
- Re: Animals Have No Rights
- Prev by Date: What do you think about the first panda bred in captivity and released into the wild dieing in less than a year?
- Next by Date: Re: Animals Have No Rights
- Previous by thread: Re: Animals Have No Rights
- Next by thread: Re: Animals Have No Rights
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|