Re: Humanism and Animal Rights (omitted link)
- From: "Ron Peterson" <ron@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 26 Jan 2006 21:25:50 -0800
theBeaver wrote:
> In the absence of law, what would restrict individual actions?
Nothing. And the law doesn't restrict individual actions, it punishes
people for performing deliberate actions considered to be crimes.
> We ALL have the moral imperative to speak for animals, as for any who
> are powerless, including children. ...
Where does the moral imperative come from?
--
Ron
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Humanism and Animal Rights (omitted link)
- From: theBeaver
- Re: Humanism and Animal Rights (omitted link)
- References:
- Humanism and Animal Rights
- From: theBeaver
- Re: Humanism and Animal Rights (omitted link)
- From: Roger Johansson
- Re: Humanism and Animal Rights (omitted link)
- From: theBeaver
- Re: Humanism and Animal Rights (omitted link)
- From: David V.
- Re: Humanism and Animal Rights (omitted link)
- From: theBeaver
- Re: Humanism and Animal Rights (omitted link)
- From: David V.
- Re: Humanism and Animal Rights (omitted link)
- From: theBeaver
- Re: Humanism and Animal Rights (omitted link)
- From: Roger Johansson
- Re: Humanism and Animal Rights (omitted link)
- From: theBeaver
- Re: Humanism and Animal Rights (omitted link)
- From: Ron Peterson
- Re: Humanism and Animal Rights (omitted link)
- From: theBeaver
- Humanism and Animal Rights
- Prev by Date: Re: Humanism in 2006
- Next by Date: Re: Humanism and Animal Rights (omitted link)
- Previous by thread: Re: Humanism and Animal Rights (omitted link)
- Next by thread: Re: Humanism and Animal Rights (omitted link)
- Index(es):