Re: Humanism and Animal Rights (omitted link)
- From: "David V." <spam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 14:36:27 -0800
theBeaver wrote:
David V. wrote:
And some of us are beyond it. From what I saw, your writing was not "intellectual advancement" but self promotion and ego. Sorry.
If you are truly "beyond it", then you have mastered it,.....
No, you misunderstand. I am beyond the dire need to impress others with so-called "intellectual advancement."
Just because animal rights is not the main thrust of Humanism, does not mean it's not a part of it.
If animal rights are part of humanism, then I challenge....
Your challenge is meaningless.
Of course, anything's meaningless when you choose to avoid it.
No, YOU are meaningless. YOU are no one. YOUR challenge is meaningless. Don't take it personally, you are just not a leader that can do any challenging, especially when that challenge is build on strawman arguments. -- Dave
The trouble with the world is not that people know too little, but that they know so many things that ain't so. Mark Twain. .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Humanism and Animal Rights (omitted link)
- From: theBeaver
- Re: Humanism and Animal Rights (omitted link)
- References:
- Humanism and Animal Rights
- From: theBeaver
- Re: Humanism and Animal Rights (omitted link)
- From: theBeaver
- Re: Humanism and Animal Rights (omitted link)
- From: Roger Johansson
- Re: Humanism and Animal Rights (omitted link)
- From: theBeaver
- Re: Humanism and Animal Rights (omitted link)
- From: David V.
- Re: Humanism and Animal Rights (omitted link)
- From: theBeaver
- Re: Humanism and Animal Rights (omitted link)
- From: David V.
- Re: Humanism and Animal Rights (omitted link)
- From: theBeaver
- Humanism and Animal Rights
- Prev by Date: Re: Humanism in 2006
- Next by Date: Re: Humanism in 2006
- Previous by thread: Re: Humanism and Animal Rights (omitted link)
- Next by thread: Re: Humanism and Animal Rights (omitted link)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|