Re: Humanism in 2006
- From: "David V." <spam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 11:02:21 -0800
downinthefolds@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
I think humanists' efforts to combat the prejudices and
limitations of traditional religions are generally good
efforts and I share a lot there with people who call
themselves humanists. On the other hand I find that people
who call themselves humanists tend to accept that science's
mode of knowing and proof preclude the existence and validity of other forms of gaining knowledge.....
Yet you fail to show how "other forms of gaining knowledge" are better, or equal, to the scientific method.
-- Dave
.....If you are open to the point of gullibility and have not an ounce of skeptical sense in you, then you cannot distinguish the useful ideas from the worthless ones - Carl Sagan, 1987. .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Humanism in 2006
- From: Joseph H
- Re: Humanism in 2006
- References:
- Re: Humanism in 2006
- From: Roger Johansson
- Re: Humanism in 2006
- From: Scott
- Re: Humanism in 2006
- From: Roger Johansson
- Re: Humanism in 2006
- From: Scott
- Re: Humanism in 2006
- From: John Brockbank
- Re: Humanism in 2006
- From: Joseph H
- Re: Humanism in 2006
- From: Roger Johansson
- Re: Humanism in 2006
- From: Joseph H
- Re: Humanism in 2006
- From: Roger Johansson
- Re: Humanism in 2006
- From: Joseph H
- Re: Humanism in 2006
- From: Roger Johansson
- Re: Humanism in 2006
- From: Joseph H
- Re: Humanism in 2006
- From: Roger Johansson
- Re: Humanism in 2006
- From: Joseph H
- Re: Humanism in 2006
- From: Roger Johansson
- Re: Humanism in 2006
- From: downinthefolds
- Re: Humanism in 2006
- Prev by Date: Re: Humanism in 2006
- Next by Date: Re: humanism today
- Previous by thread: Re: Humanism in 2006
- Next by thread: Re: Humanism in 2006
- Index(es):