What ID is and is not
- From: Numerous <numerous@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 15:24:09 +0200
"I have found when lecturing in the United States on this topic that
the perception of what we are saying, the perception of our case for
intelligent design, and its reception, have been badly distorted by a
fear of fundamentalism. Intelligent design has been equated in
people's minds with Young Earth Creationism no matter how clearly and
patiently and sometimes emphatically we attempt to explain
otherwise....Intelligent design is not a religous doctrine, it is not
an interpretation of the Genesis text, it is in fact a scientific
inference from biological evidence based on the same methods of
reasoning Darwin himself used in The Origins of the Species."
- Stephen Meyer
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: What ID is and is not
- From: JohnN
- Re: What ID is and is not
- From: Frank J
- Re: What ID is and is not
- From: timothya1956
- Re: What ID is and is not
- From: Bob Casanova
- Re: What ID is and is not
- From: Mike Painter
- Re: What ID is and is not
- From: Attila
- Re: What ID is and is not
- From: Inez
- Re: What ID is and is not
- From: UC
- Re: What ID is and is not
- Prev by Date: Re: Chez what! was Re: How transitional fossils are determined
- Next by Date: Re: What ID is and is not
- Previous by thread: More Conservative madness
- Next by thread: Re: What ID is and is not
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|