Erik Andrulis Gyres concept and Natural Selection

This paper by Andrulis is an example of Delusion induced by rejecting
the pattern/design dichotomy. PZ Myers in his review is correct, it is
erroneous. Andrulis has indeed gone of the rails, one feels very sorry
for the poor man and I pray that he comes to his senses.

In any case, the first thing I did was F3 , looking for Natural
Selection :

http://www.mdpi.com/2075-1729/2/1/1/

-----------------------
Evolutionary emergence. The Darwinian theory of evolution by natural
selection does not address
how novelty emerges in the universe [784,785]. As modeled here and as
observable in the natural
world, gyres expand and develop as a consequence of continual IEM
flow, rearrangement, and
coalescence. When the maximum carrying capacity of a gyrosystem is
reached, it extrudes IEM due to
spatiotemporal constraints imparted by sub- and supragyrosystems; this
models self-organized
criticality [786]. Gyrosystem collapse thus converts the accumulated,
unsustainable, potential IEM
into kinetic IEM, eliciting the emergence of an a priori unpredictable
organization that is more
thermodynamically stable. Written another way, theory shows that the
disassembled gyrosystem
provides the architectural basis and thermodynamic driving force for
evolutionary complexification.
This theory supports what Gould and Eldredge implied in their theory
of punctuated equilibrium [787]:
evolutionary emergence occurs by a true quantal leap. I conclude that
my theory is a comprehensive
and scientifically accurate alternative to natural selection.

Meaning of Life. Life has many definitional meanings but lacks a
complete and consistent scientific
explanation. In this work, I have pursued and arrived at a scientific
answer to the Schrödingerian
question, “What is Life? [1].” Traditionally, the living cell is
commonly called “animate” and all other
biospheric and cellular chemicals and molecules are called
“inanimate.” However, this theory and the
law of vortex motion prove that all these physical systems gyrate and
are, as such, “animated"

Moreover, theory-defined laws of unity and correspondence require that
life and Earth evolve as one,
with thermodynamically appropriate conditions (the fitness of the
biosphere [788,789]). Unexpectedly,
then, this theory reveals that Earth—or, for that matter, any
celestial, physical, chemical, and molecular
system—is alive, that is, synonymous with life. Given this
definitional and conceptual upheaval,
I propose that a very open and candid discussion of the meaning of life
—well beyond this text—is in
order. On this topic, it may be useful to consider how scientifically
redefining life elucidates
non-scientific, eudaemonic meanings of “life,” “living,” or “alive,”
related to ontology, consciousness,
sentience, behavior, vocation, or social interactions

.