Re: The State of the Evidence in the HelioCenrtic/GeoCentric Debate

On Feb 4, 10:28 am, T Pagano <not.va...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Atheists and those who have been misled by them are under the delusion
that heliocentricism is indubitable.  Nonsense.  From the very start
Copernicus's theory required only a few less epicycles than did
Ptolomey's.

The vast majority of evidence cannot distinquish between the two
models.  And none of the evidence contradicts GeoCentricism.
Furthermore the near (but not complete) equivalency of the two models
is demonstrated by the fact that NASA sometimes uses an Earth Centered
Inertial Frame in some of its launches.    Atheists (and Ray who has
joined them) should read below and weep:

Evidences "A" (shown below) contradict heliocentricism.

Evidences "B" contradict the Big Bang geometry which avers that there
is no center to the universe.

Evidence "C" shows that a rotating shell of stars about a central
Earth would create the same forces at the Earth as would a rotating
earth in a fixed shell of stars.

_______________________________________________________
A.  Evidence that the Earth does NOT translate around the Sun or the
Milky Way CONTRADICTING Heliocentricism
---------------------------------------------------------------------------­-------
1.  Michelson-Morley interferometer experiments
2.  Dayton C. Miller interferometer Experiments
3.  George Airy's stellar aberration experiment

_________________________________________________________
B.  Evidence of absolute rotation and which CONTRADICTS Einstein's
postulate about the speed of light for all observers and consistent
with a rotating universe.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------­----
1.  Sagnac's interferometer experiments
2.  Michelson-Gale interferometer experiments
3.  GPS network of satellites

__________________________________________________________
C.  Evidence concerning Newton's empty Sphere.  Atheists assert that
there would be no forces at a central Earth with a spherical shell of
stars.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------­-----
1.  While Newton demonstrated that the forces at the center of hollow
sphere would be zero Einstein, Thiring, and others showed that if the
sphere were rotating all of the forces at the center would be
indistinquishable for a fixed shell with a rotating center.

_________________________________________________________
D.  Evidence that is equally consistent with GeoCentricism and
Heliocentricism due to identical relative motions in both
---------------------------------------------------------------------------­----
1.  Stellar parallax
2.  Stellar aberration
3.  Annual stellar doppler shift
4.  Annistropic dipole of the CMBR
5.  doppler shifts in general
6.  corriolis effect
7.  focault's penduluum
8.  Newton's water bucket experiment
9.  Lense-Thiring Effect
10. Geostationary Orbits
11. Eotvos Effect
12. Sun's Analemma
13. Earth's Axial Precession

________________________________________________________
E.  Evidence against GeoCentricism which is ignorant nonsense
---------------------------------------------------------------------------­--
1.  Impossibility of the Earth being the barycenter of the universe
due to Newton'a Law of Gravity
2.  GyroCompass theory.

_________________________________________________________
F.  Evidence of a rotating Earth which is inconclusive due to the
inability to accurately resolve angular movement smaller than 0.3 arc
sec
---------------------------------------------------------------------------­----
1.  Diurnal stellar aberration

_______________________________________________________
G.  Evidence of a rotating Earth for which misleading claims were made
and no evidence was produced
---------------------------------------------------------------------------­--
1.  Orbital launch mechanics; eastward launches

____________________________________________________________
H.  Evidence of changes in the Earth's angular momentum for which no
experimental evidence was produced
---------------------------------------------------------------------------­------
1.  Claims that earthquakes, sunami's, techtonic movements and similar
Earth events alter the Earth's angular momentum are based solely on
mathematical models which presume that the earth rotates.  No
experimental evidence produced.

___________________________________________________________
I.  Evidence of changes in the Earth's angular momentum which implies
emprical consequences known to be false.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------­-------
1.  Our moon's rate of recession

___________________________________________________________
J.  Evidence which fails because the Ptolemaic and original Tychonian
models have not been held by a geoCentricist for over 100 years.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------­-------
1.  Retrograde motion of the planets.
2.  Sun's Analemma

Regards,
T Pagano

So what was AiG's reaction when you challenged them? How about the DI?

.

Relevant Pages