Re: Dembski poses 10+1 questions for PZ Myers

I don't believe that today's ID proponents ever claim that intelligent
design must be perfect design.

I don't even know how to define "perfect" as in "perfect design".

Among other things, I suppose that a "perfect design" would mean able
to eat anything, not susceptable to aging and invincible to
predators. There's probably lots of other stuff I'm leaving out.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Dembski poses 10+1 questions for PZ Myers
    ... I suppose that a "perfect design" would mean able ... to eat anything, not susceptable to aging and invincible to ... clutter up the whole planet with far too many of them, ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Dembski poses 10+1 questions for PZ Myers
    ... design must be perfect design. ... I suppose that a "perfect design" would mean able ... to eat anything, not susceptable to aging and invincible to ...
    (talk.origins)