Re: Just the facts ma`am.
- From: All-seeing-I <apc57@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 05:20:58 -0800 (PST)
On Jan 7, 11:21 am, Reddfrogg <reddfr...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 7, 5:48 am, All-seeing-I <ap...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 6, 9:52 pm, Chris Thompson <the_thomps...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
All-seeing-I <ap...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in news:9d896590-7e0e-45c7-a698-
On the scientific method:
"G. G. Simpson stated, "It is inherent in any definition of science
that statements that cannot be checked by observation are not about
anything...or at the very best, they are not science."
I guess this leaves evolution OUT IN THE COLD, eh?
Unscientific. But we knew THAT already.
right.. Right...RIGHT ?
of course we did.
And they were not able to resist the wisdom of....
Why aren't endogenous retroviruses an observation?
Your BFF Data-boy doesn't seem to be able to address that question.
Why don't you?
Chris- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
An observation of --->what, exactly Chris?
It's an observation of the results of common descent.
Is this another one of your "Spirulina is Evolution" thingies?
Is a endogenous retrovirus an example of evolution or is it just
another example of something attempting to corrupt the existing
genetic material like HIV does?
ERVs are evidence that humans share common ancestry with other apes.
Why would you call it "corruption"?
There are many zoonotic disease humans share with animals.So I hardly
call a RetroV's evidence of evolution. All you have shown the virus is
shared between human and ape,
A virus needs a host. That makes it part of the processes on the earth
that are corrupted. If you do not understand why, then you do not
understand what the bible has explained to you about the earth's
corruption after the fall.
- Prev by Date: Re: Your opinion wanted [ real scientists only please ]
- Next by Date: Re: Just the facts ma`am.
- Previous by thread: Re: Just the facts ma`am.
- Next by thread: Re: Just the facts ma`am.